05.06.2013 Views

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 104 -<br />

provide the committee with the names of Masonic police officers involved with units responsible for<br />

several miscarriages of justice. Despite indicating to the committee in November 1997 that the United<br />

Grand Lodge would reveal these names, a 50-strong meeting of the Masonic Board of General Purposes<br />

had ordered Higham not to reveal them after all. The miscarriages of justice in question were major ones:<br />

the scandalous ruining of John Stalker, who got too close to the truth in his investigations into the Royal<br />

Ulster Constabulary‘s [RUC] Shoot-to-Kill policy in Northern Ireland; the disgraced West Midlands<br />

Serious Crime Squad which after 30 charges of misconduct, was closed down in 1986, and the discredited<br />

police investigation into the Birmingham pub bombings which led to the malicious prosecution and<br />

imprisonment of the now pardoned Birmingham Six. The following paragraph shows the true extent and<br />

how powerful the Freemasons, thus the UK‘s Illuminati really are.<br />

Masonic Manipulation - Ex-police officers had made allegations that Freemason officers in the West<br />

Midlands Serious Crime Squad had operated a ―firm within a firm‖. Serious allegations of malign<br />

Masonic manipulation extended to police officers in the John Stalker affair and to both journalists and<br />

police officers implicated in the Birmingham Six scandal. The Home Affairs Select Committee, which had<br />

been considering the influence of Freemasonry on the judiciary and police since 1995, wanted to know<br />

which of the 161 names under suspicion in these cases, were Freemasons - so that it could assess the<br />

validity of these allegations. But now, Commander Higham - who once gave a speech asserting ―there is<br />

very little secret about Freemasonry‖, - was refusing to comply with one of the most powerful select<br />

committees in parliament; ―I hope you will accept that is ‗no‘, but not with contempt‖, he whimpered in<br />

his impossible situation as public fall guy for the clandestine Masonic hierarchy. For a while a<br />

constitutional crisis looked on the cards.<br />

The Sergeant at Arms issued an order giving the United Grand Lodge 14 days to comply with the<br />

request of the Committee. - No one had ever defied parliament in this way before but now the Freemasons<br />

thought themselves powerful enough to try. Both parliament and the press held its breath, and when<br />

finally, as the deadline approached, a deal was made. The United Grand Lodge agreed to provide Chris<br />

Mullin, the Chairman of the Select Committee, with the requested names on condition that only he and the<br />

clerk [who you can bet is also Freemason] to the committee could see them! Not even the other members<br />

of the Committee would be allowed to see them and many argued that the necessity to strike a deal at all<br />

provided further evidence of the extant political power still wielded by Freemasons. The ill-fated<br />

Commander Michael Higham, who many view as a relatively harmless Freemason occupying a public<br />

relations role, informed the Select Committee that the United Grand Lodge was to retire him early for<br />

reasons that he did not know!<br />

On the Friday 26th March 2010, relatives of two IRA men shot dead by SAS soldiers 20 years ago are<br />

to go before the UK‘s highest court as part of a legal battle over inquests into the killings. In an unusual<br />

step, senior judges granted leave for lawyers representing the families of Dessie Grew and Martin<br />

McCaughey to take their case to the Supreme Court in London. Their decision was described as a major<br />

development with ―profound implications‖ for nearly 20 cases involving deaths which predate domestic<br />

enforcement of the European Convention on Human Rights. - Grew, 37, and McCaughey, 23, were gunned<br />

down close to isolated farm outbuildings at Lislasley outside Loughgall, Co Armagh in October 1990.<br />

It is believed the building had been under surveillance for some time by the SAS - three AK47 assault<br />

rifles were found nearby afterwards. Legal papers in the judicial review application claim four soldiers<br />

fired 72 rounds at the two men, with autopsy reports showing Grew was riddled with 48 wounds while<br />

McCaughey was hit by 10 bullets. Their deaths are part of a series of shootings which led to allegations of<br />

a Shoot-to-Kill policy by the security forces, are to be reinvestigated by detectives from the Historical<br />

Enquiries Team.<br />

That new probe was not completed at the end of 2010, raising concerns that the oldest outstanding<br />

inquest in Northern Ireland could be put back further. Lawyers for their families claimed the failure to<br />

hold a prompt inquest breached their right to life under European legislation. They also contended that it<br />

flouted domestic law requirements for a tribunal to be set up to examine the deaths as soon as possible.<br />

Solicitor Fearghal Shiels of Madden and Finucane, the firm representing the families, emphasised the<br />

importance of the outcome. He said: ―This is a highly significant development which may have profound<br />

implications not only for this inquest, but for other old inquests, numbering almost 20, where the death<br />

pre-dates the coming into force domestically of the European Convention on Human Rights. - The next of<br />

kin of those deceased may now be in a position to rely upon their rights guaranteed under the Convention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!