TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 19 -
series on drop-off‘s that were witnessed, recorded, and photographed with the police actually collecting
them. Yet the police at this stage of the game, were unaware I had this photographic evidence, and more
so, they were completely in dark about the concealed taped recording that I had with the police officer
revealing what ‗they‘ could do with someone‘s fingerprints, by ways of ‗planting them‘. And more
importantly, not even his own fellow police officers, and especially his superiors were aware what he had
foolishly confessed to me.
There I was being fitted-up by high ranking police officers from Scotland Yard‘s SFO, and lower
ranking ones in the Metropolitan Police, - whilst all along I was sitting on a time-bomb that was the
judicial equivalent as to what‘s presently happening in the middle-east, as the domino effect and
repercussions of what ‗my taped evidence‘ would have produced, - had it been made public knowledge
beforehand, - then at least four of the country‘s biggest miscarriages of justice trials would have been
halted ‗before‘ the miscarriages were allowed to happen. Though as I say, I truly didn‘t realise this IRA
link and the significance until years later, I genuinely thought I ended up winning my case, - meaning why
I was granted immunity, - was simply because my taped recording proved ‗I did do a deal with the police
after all‘. I was totally in the dark about the political ramifications and the true importance of my tape and
how it could have altered the course of history for all those poor people and their families who were
involved in those miscarriages of justice. I only wish I knew and understood this earlier, and think it‘s
only right that this evidence is brought to light and recorded for the public record.
Imagine I didn‘t have my ‗concealed taped conversation‘ to hand, I would have fitted up yet again, and
framed, it would of meant that the police were guilty of perjury; the evidence submitted throughout trial
false and that the conviction of me being found guilty erroneous. Then what if I was then able to then
produce my tape recording on an appeal, that would mean that the Home Secretary would have either to
recommend that I be pardoned or to remit the case to the Court of Appeal, and that‘s just in my case alone,
- as what sort or impact and influence would ‗my taped evidence‘ have had on the juries sitting on the
trials of the Birmingham Six, Guilford Four and the Maguire Seven whose convictions were quashed in
1991. The court held that members of the London Metropolitan Police beat some of the Seven into
confessing to the crimes and ‗withheld‘ information that would have cleared them, - and other‘s such as
Danny McNamee.
In regard to the Guildford Four‘s appeal, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Lane, said that the police had
either ―Completely fabricated the typed notes, amending them to make them look more effective, and then
creating hand-written notes to give the appearance of contemporaneous notes‖ or ―started off with
contemporaneous notes, typed them up to make them more legible, amended them to make them read
better, and then converted them back to hand-written notes.‖ [1] Either way, the police had lied, and the
conclusion was that if they had lied about this, the entire evidence against them was misleading. - The Four
were released in 1989, after having their convictions reversed. In 1987, Danny McNamee was sentenced
to 25 years for the Hyde Park bombing despite McNamee pleading that he was innocent. In 1998, shortly
after his release under the Good Friday Agreement, a judge overturned his conviction, deeming it ―unsafe‖,
for various reasons relating to ‗fingerprint evidence‘, such as McNamee‘s were meant to have been found
on a circuit board, though the fact of the matter was fingerprint evidence was ‗withheld‘ that actually
implicated other bomb makers were involved.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guildford_Four_and_Maguire_Seven
5. Dicing with Death
Some of those who had read a rough brief of this book, or helped me proofread it, had voiced their
concerns in saying; I must be either mad or foolish for writing what I have, - and that perhaps I‘m dicing
with death by doing so. I cover this matter a little further on, when I explain I might be putting my life at
stake, - yet again! They have asked, why am I writing such a scathing attack on such powerful people?
And my answer is quite simple really, - I‘m not mad, arguably I‘m foolish, though perhaps more reckless
could be the case, as how I look on it, if anything untoward was to happen to me, then so be it, all wars
have casualties and this is a ―war on truth‖ that needs to be exposed to the masses. I believe in what I am
saying with such conviction, I don‘t really care what the consequences might be for simply wanting to
reveal what I do and expressing what I feel, - as at least I can go to my grave knowing I was true to my
word and therefore myself and to those whom I trying to inform and get my message across to in the first