TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 103 -
Article Two of the European Convention on Human Rights. According to The Times on the 9th February
1988, Mr Stalker stated that: ―Although he never found written evidence of a Shoot-to-Kill policy, there
was a clear understanding that officers were expected to enforce it‖.
And just when John Stalker was closing in on Captain Simon Hayward‘s Shoot-to-kill murders, - John
Chilcot - then head of the Home Office‘s Police Department and a member of the Privy Council did
everything he could to connect John Stalker, [as he was heading an inquiry into them], with the alleged
criminal activities, [4] such as his mixing with members of the Quality Street Gang and of Manchester
business man Kevin Taylor, so as to undermine and discredited Stalker.
The Poisoned Tree - Sidgwick & Jackson, 1990 is Taylor‘s own account of what happened to him
during this period of time, and makes powerful reading and is well recommended.
Now, we have this same Sir John Chilcot, heading the Iraq War Inquiry, and perhaps now you know
why the ex Cambridge graduate, is regarded in certain political circles as ―a safe pair of hands‖, so don‘t
be fooled with his soft tone voice, his as shifty as the best of them, - and who was also a member of the
official Butler Review into the use of intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq invasion, [5] and far too lenient
towards the Blair government. - So why the hell is this man heading the Iraq War Inquiry, it simply doesn‘t
make any sense. - Oh, of course it does, he‘s a safe pair of white gloved Masonic hands, silly me, I almost
forgot!
Here‘s a little more about Capt. S. Hayward aka - Captain James Rennie, - Operations Officer of the
14th Intelligence Company‘s South Detachment - who had been imprisoned in Sweden on a drugsmuggling
set up by SK = Steak Knife - code name John Oakes, because of his dirty work in Northern
Ireland. - Starting with the Shoot-to-Kill murders in South Armagh during the emergency in the autumn of
1982 - tried to get loyalist killers to assassinate SK, but their effort was redirected against Belfast solicitor
Pat Finucane instead, whom it was alleged was a IRA sympathiser. Finucane was shot fourteen times as
he sat eating a meal at his Belfast home with his three children and wife, who was wounded in the attack.
In September 2004 UDA informer, Ken Barrett, plead guilty to Finucane‘s murder. [6]
This effort convinced SK, that his attempt to slow down the war by working with the British, was over,
and he got the Provisional IRA to mount the bombing campaign in reprisal. The attacks on the continent
in 1989 were in retaliation for the Cull on the Rock on the 6th March 1988. SK was using the code name
John Oakes to help capture the three volunteers, but British intelligence and Downing Street had other
ideas - shooting them on sight in order to expose Steak Knife‘s spying in the expectation that he would be
done away with by the Nutting Squad, the Internal Security Unit [ISU] was the name given to a counter
intelligence and interrogation unit that operated within the paramilitary organisation the Provisional Irish
Republican Army [IRA]. This unit was often referred to as the ‗Nutting Squad‘. [7]
Stalker knew Kevin Taylor and had gone on a trip with him to New York where they apparently went
on a cruise in a catamaran subsequently sold to Christopher Hayward, brother of Northern Ireland‘s
leading hit-man SK. [4] Now, no one man could go about discrediting Stalker, to the effective level they
achieved without the help and involvement of others, and this is where the Freemason Brotherhood comes
into play. Upon entering the first level of Freemasonry, an initiate promises to guard its secrets upon pain
of having my throat cut out by the root and buried in the sand of the sea at low water mark... or the more
effective punishment of being branded as a wilfully perjured individual, void of all moral worth.
This so-called harmless play-acting seems remarkably effective in ensuring secrecy. Even those who
have ceased to be Freemasons often refuse to speak of its ceremonies and practices, whilst the very few
people with experience of Freemasonry who have dared to speak to researchers, have done so
anonymously. There is little doubt that retribution for public disclosure is a real threat in the minds of all
those who have ever been initiated. [8] Okay, granted times are changing, but the threats are real, however
the Freemasons have had no alternative than to open-up, but only in a sense, because the internet has and is
constantly now exposing and making available information that once was virtually impossible to openly
come across. The internet has offered anonymity to those wishing to expose them, and my particular
references in these paragraphs, refer to when times were a little more different than they are today, - than
they were during the 1980‘s when this kind of subject matter was regarded as ultra sensitive when
occurred.
Commander Michael Higham wriggled in his chair in visible discomfort, in front of a packed press
gallery his paleness grew ever more paler as he sat cornered by questions thrown at him with increasing
frustration by members of the Home Affairs Select Committee. As grand secretary to the United Grand
Lodge of Freemasonry, the governing body for English and Welsh Masons, he had been requested to