TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 29 -
fraudulently lift and transfer and then ‗plant‘ a fingerprint without it being discovered, this is what had
happened by a forensic scientist.
Though how it‘s successfully done, is that the transfer of the fingerprint is done ‗prior‘ to forensic
examination, and of course by an unscrupulous police officer or someone else hoping to frame another
person. Try it yourself now, stop reading, go and pick up a ceramic cup, make sure it‘s dark in colour, as
white is harder to see, grip the cup firmly in your hand making sure your fingerprints are on the surface,
now angle the cup under a light, and you will clearly be able to see your fingerprints. If you can‘t, then
perhaps your hands are too clean, so wait awhile or dirty them up a little. If you had done this on a glass
surface, then the prints would be so much more prominent and even clearer to see. If you then got some
Sellotape, placed it over the print, smoothed it down, and them peeled it off again, then re-laid the
Sellotape down again onto say a windowpane surface, you would have successful transferred the print, and
of course no Ninhydrin aluminium dusting powder was ever used or present.
However, if forensic expert was to then dust down the same windowpane with the aluminium dusting
powder, the print would jump out and obviously be clearly seen. And a quick reminder, fingerprints can
be obtained from a variety of surfaces, seats, tables, cell doors, toilets doors, handles, cups and glasses, tins
of drinks and items you‘ve been handed to look at etc., - and one more thing, even if there was an outline
of sticky tape as Mansfield suggest, by simply using a cotton wool bud, white spirit or nail varnish
remover, - this will soon solve that problem.
Michael Mansfield QC, also represented victim‘s families at the Bloody Sunday Inquiry, and has
appeared in some high-profile miscarriage cases, among his portfolio of cases includes Hanratty [post
appeal] who was hung in 1962, the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six and the Hyde Park bombing case.
And in the latter case, Danny McNamee‘s conviction of conspiracy to cause the explosion in July 1982
was quashed on appeal. [3] - As well as the Stephen Lawrence case, that brought about the new ―Double
Jeopardy‖ law, whereas a person can be re-trialled, despite being found not guilty at a previous trial of the
same charge. - Regardless to this unjust changing of the law, no one has ever been convicted of
Lawrence‘s murder. Mansfield cites that among the major causes of miscarriages of justice that have
occurred, it is due to; ―improperly obtained confessions, flawed identification or scientific evidence‖. In
McNamee‘s case, the Court of Appeal found the conviction; ―unsafe because of questionable fingerprint
evidence‖. Although the appeal process may lead to freedom, psychological pressures can be
overwhelming. Mansfield says; ―The greatest iniquity is if you protest your innocence then you forfeit
parole. This often means that you end up serving more time than the person who did commit the crime‖.
And this is how the system works, say you were sentenced to 8 years, you‘re normally serve 4 years
and be entitled to be set free after this period. However, say you‘re truly are not guilty and strongly protest
your innocence decide to appeal, it may take 2 years or more before your case can be reheard, - and now
let‘s say you lost that appeal. – You‘re then simply just sent back to prison to ―restart‖ the whole 8 years
you was originally first given, despite you‘ve already served two years out of it. – You‘ll now have to
serve 6 years in total before your set free, and not the four.
So, is it any wonder why so many innocent people still decide not to appeal, as the chances and odds are
always stacked against you and the likelihood of you being found guilty again is very high and very likely,
as you will see by the following figures, as on the 31st of March 2002, - I couldn‘t seem to find more up
to date information, - the Criminal Cases Review Commission, established in 1997 alone it had handled
some 4,830 applications from people claiming to have suffered rough justice in criminal courts.
Of these, only 161 resulted in referrals to the Court of Appeal and only 64 convictions were quashed.
Now what you have to also consider is this, if 4,830 applications were made in this just quoted period, and
the appellants are fully aware they would be sacrificing the time they‘ve already served in prison if they
were to fail and not win their appeal, then surely it can only therefore reflect how many injustices are really
occurring in our courts everyday of the week, bar of course when there not sitting, and that our current
appeal system is also flawed.
What‘s equally important to consider, is that even though ―planted‖ or fabricated fingerprint evidence is
rare and has only occurred in a rather small number of cases in comparison to the overall majority of all
other court cases involving such evidence, is the fact what is just as worrying is that the abundant of
―wrongly identified‖ fingerprint evidence, that is far too often used and regularly presented in many cases
all over the world as being genuine forensic evidence.
Remember we‘re born and bred to believe in and trust authority and our so called; Masonic, Alpha,
Delta, Kappa, - I explain all about these groups, - like fraternal experts, and everyone knows that if you