TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 30 -
find a fingerprint and its submitted and used against the defendant in the dock as being ―their fingerprint‖,
then surely they must be guilty, or at the very least linked to the crime somehow? Forensic scientists have
long claimed fingerprint evidence is infallible, but for example, in a widely publicised error that landed an
innocent man behind bars as a suspect in the 2004 Madrid train bombing, alerted the world to the potential
flaws in the fingerprint system.
Criminologist Simon Cole has shown that not only do errors occur, but as many as a thousand incorrect
fingerprint matches could be made each year in the US alone. [4] This is in spite of safeguards intended to
prevent errors. Cole‘s 2009 study was the first to analyse all publicly known mistaken fingerprint matches.
In analysing these cases of faulty matches dating from 1920, which seems rather low, but as Cole suggests,
that of the 22 incidents exposed, including eight since 1999 and a rapid increase, are merely the tip of the
pyramid, - oops, I meant iceberg.
Despite the publicly acknowledged cases of error, fingerprint examiners have long held that fingerprint
identification is ―infallible‖, and testified in court that their error rate for matching fingerprints is ―zero‖.
―Rather than blindly insisting there is zero error in fingerprint matching, we should acknowledge the
obvious, study the errors openly and find constructive ways to prevent faulty evidence from being used to
convict innocent people‖, said Cole. Though, in my opinion the true reason they don‘t want to admit
they‘ve been wrong, and that their error rate is zero, is because they know it‘s very likely that many a
person has been executed on such ―infallible‖ evidence. And even though I can‘t find the actual statistic
for similar cases in the UK, you can basically take it as being very much on par with that of the US, and I
dread to think what the statistics are in other countries around the world were corruption is more rife than it
is here in the West.
[1] .
[2] "savethemales.ca - Illuminati Use "Magick" Against Us." .
[3] "INNOCENT - Fighting miscarriages of justice." .
[4] "Study Of Faulty Fingerprints Debunks Forensic Science .
7. Suppression of the Internet
30,000 Fifty Centers - employed to control China‘s internet: I‘ve already mentioned the huge amounts
of misinformation I have come across, and apart from all that to contend with, there are also many other
obstacles that can make discovering the truth so much harder. - So for these reasons I would like to
reiterate what I have basically already said, because I want to sort of drive it home to you that there are
many dark forces whose job, or purpose it is in helping keep what I am about to reveal to you, suppressed
and from getting out to a wider audience than it already has.
What‘s quite evident here is the fact that there are so many cogs turning together all at the same time,
but not necessarily in unison and in the same direction, but in many cases against each other. There is such
an abundance of evidence that is full of half-truths, false claims, blatant lies or the actual truth all mixed up
together. The vast information available on the majority of the subjects I touch on, and especially so on
the internet, is so colossal that it would take you what seems like a lifetime to research and to be able to
confidently achieve a satisfactory outcome as to what is factual and what is false, and for you to feel
content enough that you may have now actually found the right answers.
Yet it appears many if not all these smokescreens and obstacles are there for a reason and been
intentional concocted and purposely orchestrated so that those who try to seek the truth will be
misinformed, misled, deceived, deluded, lead astray, lied to and therefore cheated. Without naming any
names or pointing fingers at anyone and particularly at this stage, there are many individuals, groups,
lobbyists and organisations whose sole agenda and purpose is to simply discredit anyone who may be
getting too close to the truth. The BBC reported in 2010, on what those of us who are active on the internet
have long known: that China pays people to invade the net and post apologetics for its authoritarianism,
colonialism, and imperialism, - and yet that‘s nothing, as there seems to be millions of others here in the
West doing it for nothing!
In cyberspace - where views can be expressed instantly and anonymously - is not as easy to control as
traditional news outlets. Comments, rumours and opinions can be quickly spread between internet groups
in a way that makes it hard for the government to censor. So instead of just trying to prevent people from
having their say, the government is also attempting to change the way they think. To do this, they use
specially trained - ideologically sound - internet commentators, rumoured to be around 30,000 at present,
[though I now believe this number has since significantly increased] [1] . They have been dubbed the 50-