TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 98 -
Now how on earth can we rely on any of these kind of people in positions of power, - in trusted
positions to establish the truth, how is it, in this instance Stephen O‘Doherty of the CPS Special Crime
Division come out with such blatant bullshit, and then to rub salt into the wound, get clean away with it? -
The de Menezes family, who said they felt vindicated by the inquest jury‘s findings, are said to be unhappy
and equally devastated that no action will be taken against those who murdered there innocent son. They
had accused the Masonic coroner of failing on every count to ensure justice was done, because of the
severe limitations he had placed on the jury‘s deliberations. - Again we have to question; - why did he, and
more importantly how is he allowed to do so?
And another strange thing that seems to miraculously coincide with these kind of unusual killings and
cases,- and yet despite living in a totally controlled world of CCTV, - the vital CCTV film footage either
goes missing, or claims then rise of faulty equipment or technical problems etc. CCTV apparently wasn‘t
working in the Pont de l‘Alma tunnel, thus no video footage could conveniently show any vehicles either
entering or exiting the tunnel, on the night Lady Diana and Dodi Fayed were killed on the 31/8/1999. It
was said no video tape was in the machine at the time of the Oklahoma Bombing, allegedly carried out by
Timothy McVeigh in 1995. On the 9/11 attacks on the US, over 80 CCTV film footages were confiscated
and held by the FBI, despite there being evidence as to what really might have crashed into the Pentagon
on that day. Not one single piece of footage from CCTV cameras exists, or if it does, has never been
shown, - showing us any of the alleged passengers at any of the three separate airports on 9/11, either
queuing up, or anything else people normally do at a airport, and it‘s as if none of them even existed, - and
there a lot of truth in that. Every trained terrorist, or skilled armed robber knows the first thing to do, is to
disable and remove any evidence from the targets CCTV system.
In regards to the de Menezes case, initial media reports suggested that no CCTV footage was available
from the Stockwell station, as recording tapes/CD‘s had not been replaced after being removed for
examination the previous day before the suspected attempted bombings.
Other reports stated that faulty cameras on the platform were the reason for the lack of video evidence.
Though to help throw us the public off the scent, as no one could really believe there was no kind of video
footage whatsoever of such a busy station area, there was all of a sudden an ―anonymous‖ source
confirming that CCTV footage was available for the ticket area, but that there was a problem with the
platform coverage. The source also and again conveniently suggested that there was no useful CCTV
footage from the platform or the train carriage.
Extracts from a later police report stated that examination of the platform cameras had produced no
footage. It said: ―It has been established that there has been a technical problem with the CCTV
equipment on the relevant platform and no footage exists‖. [7] It also reported there was no footage from
CCTV in the carriage where de Menezes was shot, saying; ―Although there was on-board CCTV in the
train, due to previous incidents, the hard drive had been removed and not replaced‖.
The platform CCTV system is maintained by the Tube Lines Consortium in charge of maintaining the
Northern Line, however unofficial [shit-scared] sources from inside the company insisted that the cameras
were in working order. It was also reported, that London Underground sources insisted that at least three
of the four cameras trained on the Stockwell Tube platform were in full working order, and rejected
suggestions that the cameras had not been fitted with new tapes after police took away footage from the
previous day, [8] the 21st July 2005, when suspects in the failed bombings caught trains there. - So who do
we believe? Ordinary London Transport staff, with no allegiance, - or the government controlled Police?
What‘s happened to our country and our world? - Who‘s in control, turning a blind eye and letting it all
occur, and who‘s inadvertently advocating this evil in the first place? Well these questions are some of the
reasons for writing this book, as I‘m hoping I can help build a bigger picture to show where and whom the
orders are coming from, and as to why they want use all living in fear.
In May 2008-Chelsea CO19 are called to Chelsea, London, where Mark Saunders, [9] a defence
barrister, was locked in his luxury flat after opening fire at his neighbour‘s houses with a shotgun. After a
tense standoff, during which Saunders exchanged fire with C019 officers, he was shot several times by
marksmen. Taking no chances, CO19 stormed the flat, throwing in stun grenades and tear gas canisters.
Mr Saunders was taken outside so he could be given medical assistance but it was too late as he was
already dead from his wounds. Saunders family say that the IPCC has accepted that it did not seize all the
relevant accounts from police officers about the shooting more than a month afterwards - allowing a long
time to confer, - but only after Charlotte Saunders, the barrister‘s sister, won permission on the 17th July
2008 at the High Court for a judicial review of an ongoing investigation into the shooting being carried out