TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 379 -
refers to the ―Seven laws of Noah‖, which are a list of seven moral imperatives which, according to the
Talmud, were given by God to Noah as a binding set of laws for all mankind. ―A Mason is obliged by his
tenure to observe the moral law as a true Noachide; and if he rightly understands the Craft…‖ The
discussion of politics and religion is forbidden within a Masonic Lodge, in part so a Freemason will not be
placed in the situation of having to justify his personal interpretation. Thus, reference to a ―Supreme
Being‖, will mean the Christian Trinity the father, the son and the holy-ghost to a Christian Freemason,
Allah to a Muslim, Joseph to a Jew, or Para Brahman to a Hindu, etc. [1]
And while most Freemasons would take the view that the term ―Supreme Being‖ equates to God, others
may hold a more complex or philosophical interpretation of the term, and particularly to a Hindu, Pagan or
a member of the Church of Satan. [1] And here‘s where the Freemasons have a ―get out of jail free card‖, -
and I mention it every now and again, - but by forbidding the discussion of politics and religion within a
Masonic Lodge; doesn‘t then stop it taking place outside and in the gentleman‘s club, the nineteenth hole,
or the pub around the corner does it now. By ―forbidding it‖, doesn‘t then make something disappear, the
beliefs still remain, and which is the most important aspect to the individuals own beliefs, is that if they
genuinely believe in a ―Supreme Being‖, the same ―being‖ as what the majority of Christians, Muslims or
Jews believe in, and what I mean by that, the ―same monotheist Being‖, that is generally accepted, referred
to, or known as within these just said religions, - then when in reference to this Being - you would think it
was acceptable and feasible to assume they were all referring to the ―same Being‖, as to what most other
religions have in mind and mean when they refer to it as well.
So even though Freemasonry requires the initiate to declare their belief in a Supreme Being, the
candidate is not asked to expand on, or explain their interpretation of what it is their supposed to believe in.
I know of people who utterly believe in Satan, Lucifer as opposed to Jesus, they see us as all fallen angels,
all sinners and need to go through this life of devilment before being able to see the light and rise again. I
have explained my interpretation of what this ―Being‖ may be like, and the fraternity has been established
long enough to have resolved this matter of anomaly, which is more than a case of just Paganism,- so why
do they not describe or explain to the initiate their interpretation of this Supreme Being as do all other
religions? – As by not doing so, thus leaves the outsider or the newly initiated into the Craft wide open to
speculation as of what their ―Being‖ might be.
How it presently stands, is that they will openly accept that the worshiping Freemason on the left hand
side of you, believes in Lucifer, while the Muslim on your right believes in Mohammad, the Jew behind
you in Joseph, whilst you‘re stuck in the middle believing in a Christian aspect of Jesus and what you‘ve
been raised to know, and interpret what that belief is being as it is, whilst the Wiccan is drawing a
pentagram all around you. Whereas the Hindu, is quite different in a sense, as Hinduism, often referred to
as the ‗oldest religion‘, and whose belief system spans monotheism, polytheism, pantheism, monism,
atheism, agnosticism, gnosticism among others; and its concept of God is complex and depends upon each
particular tradition and philosophy. It is sometimes referred to as henotheistic [i.e., involving devotion to a
single god while accepting the existence of others], but any such term is an over generalisation.
Most Hindus believe that the spirit or soul - the true self of every person, called the ātman is eternal. If
I were to personally recommend a religion, it would most likely be something like Hinduism, and if this is
the kind of beliefs system Freemasonry truly believes in, then why on earth don‘t they come clean and
admit what it truly is. [2] As here is the main problem of Freemasonry, though it wouldn‘t be if they didn‘t
insist in requiring the candidate, initiate or member to believe in an un-interpreted Supreme Being - i.e.,
God, as they would then be outside the confines of religion, and what religions are generally accepted as
being. If religion plays no role in Freemasonry, why don‘t they completely omit any reference to, or
requirement in having to believe in a Supreme Being in the first place?
But because they do insist in requiring the initiated to believe in a un-interpreted Supreme Being, this
allows them to introduce and bastardise their own meanings to the interpretation of a Supreme Being,
whom in their own case is a ‗Being‘ who resides within the confounds of dark forces and where evil
supersedes that of good, and why so many disillusioned and psychopathic people truly believe God has
instructed them to do the evil they may have carried out and done. In the ritual, the Supreme Being is
referred to as the Great Architect of the Universe, which alludes to the use of architectural symbolism
within Freemasonry. [1]
Now, if Freemasons said something along the lines of: We believe we are all born equal innocent and
with good intentions, [not the hierarchical system we‘re expected to believe in and accepted with no
questions asked, i.e., a Supreme Being = King/Queen/Royal/elite families downwards], and only the
corrupt person wishes to alter this natural state of being, as they too have been abused and corrupted
beforehand, then I wouldn‘t have such a problem with them. We all have an equal understanding as to