TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 41 -
get out of hand in certain places where it almost became a Black verses White issue, and the black
community were about to lose the public sympathy. The Scarman enquiry was set-up, and the laws were
repealed and peace came about, and there‘s no doubt the Blackman won, and the reason why governments
and the police now shit themselves, as they don‘t really know for certain how to deal with crime and the
drugs problem in general.
Perhaps that‘s what‘s needed a good old Brixton town, Toxteth, Bristol, European style riot, - No! A
worldwide revolution is more like it! Letting them know we‘re had enough of them taking the piss and
eroding our laws and rights, but then again and with much regret I have to condemn such behaviour,
because that‘s exactly what the Illuminati cabals actually want us to do, they want to stir up the trouble, so
the ―Young Mazzini‖ groups kick-off, and they can then enforce even more stringent laws and regulations,
with even a larger and well equipped police force than ever before, - remember yeah olde illuminati
saying: Order out of Chaos.
No, - believe it or not, the best thing is ―peaceful protest‖, but well organised and prolonged, bring the
roads and streets to a standstill like they do in France, make it impossible for the rich to trade, learn to go
without, work together and prevent everyday life from being able to function properly, and let‘s do
peacefully.
What‘s supposed to make our legal system the envy of the world, is solely because of our fairness, a
person is ―not guilty‖ until proven so by twelve equal peers, it doesn‘t matter if these men are guilty as
hell. As what really matters here, is that we, and for all our sakes, need to be seen, and for them to be
―proved‖ guilty by us the public, not by one man and his Masonic buddies, - whilst fleecing the public
purse of millions of pounds in the process. - At present, all criminal cases dealt with at Crown Courts
[except appeals from magistrates‘ courts] are heard before a jury of twelve. As with civil cases, a
procedure requires the jury to try to reach unanimity, but if, after a reasonable time, which must be at least
two hours, they cannot agree, the judge may accept a majority verdict of ten in the case of eleven or twelve
jurors, or nine in the case of ten jurors. [2]
However in the case of my trial, in which I must again stress, I was ―framed‖ by the police, and was not
guilty to begin with. The jury couldn‘t at first agree to a unanimous verdict, and told the judge so, even
though there were 12 jurors in my case, the judge sent them back out, indicating he would accept their
verdict of ―guilty‖ in the case of nine to three. Directing the jury to go out and do this is in itself against
the law, and an abuse of his own powers.
My own barrister said the judge has gone mad, and even went as far to say the judge was indicating 8:4
majority might next be asked of the jury, after so many hours, normally a retrial would be the case. I‘d put
good money on it that this judge is a Freemason – an ―Establishment Judge‖, the courtroom is his domain
and manor and where he‘s a law unto himself, - and this trial was going to be used as a flagship case, it
was a politically sensitive time and the police were getting so much bad press, times don‘t change, - and I
was being trialled with two others for Grievous Bodily Harm [GBH] Section 18 with intent to injure a
―Lone policeman‖. The public message they wanted to send out via the mass tentacles of the media was
to be a strong one; ―Scum found Guilty of GBH of Dixon Dock Green Bobby‖. Our sentences were set to
be unprecedented and I feel we would have been given the maximum prison sentence that could have been
handed down by this wicked judge. – GBH Section 18 Assault, can only ever be dealt with in the Crown
Court, and can result in a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, although sentences of more than 10
years for GBH Section 18 are rare [3] . My barrister said if he convicts me/us on this majority of 9:3, they
would automatically put in for an appeal, though that wasn‘t any comfort to me.
And this is what these corrupt establishment judges do, they exceed their own powers, knowing the
persons will be sent to jail on a flimsy unsafe verdict, but it doesn‘t matter, the defendants now in jail, the
message has been sent out, and they got what they wanted. Knowing in advance, an appeal will slowly be
put into process and perhaps a minimum of 18 months or so would have gone by. Then if the defendant
loses their appeal they will have to restart their sentence from day one, with the 18 months or so their
already served not being taken into consideration, and this is the reason many innocent persons do not
appeal and get on with what they were sentenced to in the first place. And then, - even if the judges
Masonic buddies at the Court of Appeal find that the judge, who would have been even been prepared to
accept an 8:4 majority verdict as in my case, - was bang out of order and totally unlawful, - they would
then simply either ask for a retrial, or perhaps they too were willing to overthrow our present laws, and
uphold the judge‘s decision and let the sentence stand.
Leaving it to my legal team and me to then fight the case in The Hague, - or I could quite easily just
have been released, - as they know I would had already served the equivalent to a 3 year sentence anyway,