TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 429 -
been somewhat callous in their describing the problems we face and their suggestions of perhaps how
they‘d tackle this dilemma.
Though the fact of the matter is this, they‘re simply not pussyfooting around so obviously appear rather
blunt with their responses to the seriousness of this situation, and what the world is having to face whether
we like it or not. As what they are saying in some respects, and as I say the statistics seems to back-up,
and even though I am quite dubious about certain statistics, as we know there are; ‗Lies, dammed
lies,...and then there are statistics‘, and that much data and statistic is very much at times adulterated, and
in this instance who can say this too hasn‘t been the case?
However, with are present system of births and deaths recorded etc., I am quite willing to accept the
current population figures are correct, though will still liberally allow for an error in the statistics by as
much as the Georgia Guidestones states which is: ―Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual
balance with nature‖. So even allowing for this huge figure to be deducted from the present world
population, which is very unlikely it is by this much, - we‘re nevertheless still in the shit. See to me, and
of course I could be wrong, but if the statistics do add up as to what we are being told are true and correct,
then our ‗experts‘, too know of this, and therefore ‗something‘ has to be done to combat this incredibly
serious problem, in which, short of sterilising the majority of women on the planet, a solution of some kind
has to be found.
And it‘s because ‗they‘ too are fully aware of this predicament, - that it seems to eerily confirm that we
are indeed building up for this perhaps necessary ‗human cull‘, - because whether we like it or not, the
figures seem to do the talking, and the present world resources and the limited food we can produce, - will
ultimately be the deciding factor, though I‘m certain we could sustain such growth if the rich were to hand
over the land.
Here‘s what Prince Phillip the Duke of Edinburgh had to say when he addressed the Chancellor‘s
Lecture, at Salford University, on the 4th June 1982. ―As long ago as 1798, Malthus explained what
happens when the factors limiting the increase in any population are removed. One of the factors noticed
by Darwin was that all species are capable of producing vastly greater populations than can be sustained
by existing resources; populations did not increase at the rate at which they are capable was the basis for
his theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. The relevance to natural selection of this capacity for
overproduction is that as each individual is slightly different to all the others it is probable that under
natural conditions those individuals which happen to be best adapted to the prevailing circumstances have
a better chance of survival. Well, so what? Well, take a look at the figures for the human population of
this world. One hundred fifty years ago it stood at about 1,000 million or in common parlance today, 1
billion. It then took about a100 years to double to 2 billion. It took 30 years to add the third billion and 15
years to reach today‘s total of 4.4 billion. [14th March 2011 figures show the world population to be
6,905,779,508]. With a present world average rate of growth of 1.8%, the total population by the year
2000 will have increased to an estimated 6 billion and in that and in subsequent years 100 million people
will be added to the world population each year.
In fact it could be as much as 16 billion by 2045. As a consequence the demand on resources of land
alone will mean a third less farm land available and the destruction of half of the present area of
productive tropical forest. Bearing in mind the constant reduction of non-renewable resources, there is a
strong possibility of growing scarcity and reduction of standards. More people consume more resources.
It is as simple as that; and transferring resources and standards from the richer to the poorer countries
can only have a marginal effect in the face of this massive increase in the world population‖. [4]
Prince Philip, in his Forward to; If I Were an Animal; United Kingdom, Robin Clark Ltd., 1986. ―I just
wonder what it would be like to be reincarnated in an animal whose species had been so reduced in
numbers than it was in danger of extinction. What would be its feelings toward the human species whose
population explosion had denied it somewhere to exist..., I must confess that I am tempted to ask for
reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus‖ [4]
We‘re all targets, and we‘re the only ones who can do anything to stop and prevent it from getting any
worse, - and believe me it‘s without a doubt going to happen. - The task, our task is virtually impossible, I
could well be living in ‗cuckoo land‘ thinking that we can do anything to stop or even prevent it.
However, we have to draw on the strength from all the millions upon millions of innocent poor men,
women and children who were unnecessarily and brutally killed in the Masonic/Illuminati led mass
―human culling‖ of the 1st and 2nd World Wars, [67,000,000 died in WWII alone!], and not forgetting