TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 135 -
lines during that first inauguration, - which then led-on to the anticipated and expected cries that the
inauguration was ‗invalid‘, - then what was to follow can only be regarded as a complete and utter farce.
The official story as to why this happened was: ―Part of the difficulty was that Roberts did not have the
text of the oath with him but relied on his memory‖. - I say anticipated and expected, because if no one
from outside the Masonic fraternity claimed for it to have been a ‗botched-job‘, thus invalid, then it‘s the
expected collective duty of those in ‗brotherhood‘ to make sure they do, hence allowing and guaranteeing
another oath-taking procedure to arise, in which duly did happen, and was rearranged to be taken again that
very next day.
White House counsel Greg Craig said; ―...out of an ‗abundance of caution‘ - the ‗second oath‘ again
administered by Judge John G. Roberts, would take place at 7:35 pm on the Wednesday‖. And it did in
the White House‘s ‗Map Room‘, it was not allowed to be filmed, and only four other White House staff
attended and witnessed the procedure, it was sound recorded, and photographs were taken for the record.
Now if you‘re from that side of the fence who doesn‘t believe the first inauguration was a botch-up
anyway, or that it had been manipulated and controlled from start to finish for the sole benefit of the
Masonic agenda, then how is it then, Judge Roberts, had the audacity and upright boldness to announce; ―I
have ‗No Bible‘ to hand!‖ – What did he say! – Some have said this is because he didn‘t want to be seen
holding the Koran in his hand, as the Bible is not really his book of faith, and that since his appointment as
president the White House is promoting ‗anti-Christian‘ policies, but I‘m not getting into that argument, I
don‘t care what the man‘s faith is, there‘ll the same to me.
Judge Roberts has administered, and taken the oath himself and witnessed such a procedure on an
abundant of occasions whilst acting as an attorney or judge in hundreds of court cases, so therefore knows
more than anyone else how important and significant the Holy Bible is on such an ‗oath taking‘ occasion, -
his the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for fuck‘s sake, - how can he not know? In 2005 Roberts took
the Constitutional ―oath of office‖, administered by senior Associate Justice John Paul Stevens at the
White House, on the 29th September, and again on the 3rd October when he took the ―judicial oath‖
provided for by the Judiciary Act of 1789 at the United States Supreme Court building when on both
occasions he placed his left hand on the bible, whilst holding his right hand up swearing the oath.
However, Freemason Obama equally bold, goes along with the charade and says; ―It doesn‘t matter it‘s
still legal‖. Which is true, you can even affirm if you‘re an atheist.
In the book; Dreams from my Father, A Story of Race and Inheritance by Barack Obama, on Page 37,
―Lolo [Lolo was Obama‘s Indonesian step-father, and whom he‘s says; ‗was a big influence in his life‘, on
Page 38 he states: ―So it was to Lolo that I turned for guidance and instruction.‖], - followed a brand of
Islam that could make room for the remnants of more ancient animist and Hindu faiths. He explained that
a man took on the powers of whatever he ate.‖
Yet what makes this whole matter bizarre, is that the world‘s media was making such a big song and
dance about the fact the Obama had personally decided to ―Swear Oath on the ‗Lincoln Bible‘‖, being that
Lincoln himself was apparently the last President to do so, and that despite all this hype and bullshit, - that
was the end to it, no more was really said on the subject and they simply went ahead with the ‗second
oath‘, without the ‗sole object‘ of symbolic meaning in his hand and what he was meant to be
fundamentally holding, or with his hand placed on it, and ‗swearing-on‘ in the first place!
It‘s a bit like a judge without his gavel, a fireman without his hose, a policeman without his truncheon,
or a priest turning up for Sunday sermon or wedding without his bible in hand. – If the Lincoln bible
wasn‘t to hand, the why didn‘t they insist that someone was to simply go to the White House library and
find one? And if the argument is there wasn‘t one there, - then send-out a buy one; ‗out of an abundance
of caution‘, and to at least silence the critics and prevent the possibility of another outcry demanding a
‗third oath‘ should be taken. This only leaves this whole oath taking procedure in disrepute and a mockery
as to what its whole purpose and objective is meant to be in the first place, thus leaving the entire practice
and process in a shambles and wide open to criticism, speculation and conspiracy theories, like what it is
today.
Considering the following details, then it must be said the reason why Judge John G. Roberts left the
bible out of the equation on the ‗second attempt‘ of Obama‘s oath at the White House, must have been
100% intentional and therefore a deliberate act of deception, because this proves he knew beyond
reasonable doubt the significance of the bible, and more than anyone else that day. As just ‗20 days prior‘
Obama‘s inauguration, on the 31st of December 2008, Michael Newdow a Californian doctor and 17 other
people, plus 10 groups representing atheists, sued none other than Chief Justice John G. Roberts, yes that‘s
right the ‗same‘ John G. Roberts, and others involved in the inauguration of Barack Obama in the United