TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 240 -
―Taxil hoax‖ as being ―proof‖ the Luciferian connection and accusations are false. It only fair that I point
out, but there doesn‘t seem to appear to be any reference as to the actual word ―Lucifer‖ being published in
Freemasonry literature, - as they use the word ―Abaddon‖, which in a sense, is in similar reference to
Lucifer . Abbadon, meaning: ―A place of destruction‖, ―The Destroyer‖ or ―Depths of Hell‖ in the
Revelation of St. John, is the king of tormenting locusts and the angel of the bottomless pit. The exact
nature of Abaddon is debated, but the Hebrew word is related to the triliteral root אבד [ABD], which in
verb form means ―to perish‖. [1]
The symbolism of Revelation 9:11; Leaves the exact identification of Abaddon open for interpretation,
with some bible scholars believing him to be the antichrist or Satan. The International Bible Students
Association identified Abaddon as Satan in C.T. Russel‘s 1917 work. [2] Jehovah‘s Witnesses take the
contrasting view, believing that Abaddon is another name of the resurrected and enthroned Jesus Christ, -
and perhaps why some people call the Jehovah‘s Wickedness! And some theologians believe Abaddon to
be just an angel. Concerning the angel holding the key to the bottomless pit from Revelation 9 and 20,
Gustav Davidson, in A Dictionary of Angels, Including the Fallen Angels, writes: In Revelation 20:2 ―he
laid hold of the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years‖.
[3] According to the foregoing, Apollion is a holy [good] angel, servant, and messenger of God; but in
occult and, generally, in non-canonical writings, he is evil. [4]
The Taxil hoax isn‘t any kind of proof that ‗all Freemasons‘ don‘t worship Lucifer, and anyway why
shouldn‘t they, if they believe in Jesus then surely they can‘t deny his bro Lucifer? Out of the six millions
members, then the likelihood some do surely must exist. Beside the Taxil hoax, seems like a hoax within
itself to me, and for those of you who don‘t know of it, we‘re examine it further on, and then again even if
it is a genuine hoax, it doesn‘t alter anything one iota, as it only confirms he was lying.
However, I must admit I can understand as to why many a Freemason might feel a little hot and
bothered under their lambskin, as after all, 98% or so of them certainly do not revere a Luciferian path, as
this majority are indeed just ordinary folk; priests, doctors, soldiers, plumbers, police officers, builders,
train or bus drivers, footballers, comedians, clowns, pork pie merchants, delivery drivers, alarm engineers
and even bank managers etc., and who are in sense upright honest people doing what they think is the best
they can for their local communities, and perhaps even society as a whole, as they certainly do not occupy
or delve into the ―dark world‖ of Freemasonry our Dan Brown as mentioned.
By their own mere existence making up the 98% plus of the fraternity, they indirectly act as the
keystone that upholds the royal arch, and whom without, the Order would simply collapse and crumble,
with those 2% or less occupying the ‗dark world‘ within it being exposed for what they truly are, and that
their evil ways would be forced into the ‗light‘, - and hopefully could then be brought to a final end. What
we need is some Wikileaks kind of whistleblowers from deep within the fraternity exposing all their dirty
aprons.
Presently and in the past, defenders of an anti-Luciferian link within the Order, state such things like;
―Neither the attributes nor personification of Lucifer or Satan play any role in the beliefs or rituals of
Freemasonry. The topic is only of interest insofar as anti-Masonic attacks have accused Freemasonry of
worshiping Lucifer. The confusion stems from such 19th century Masonic authors as Albert Pike and
Albert G. Mackey who have used the term Luciferian in its classical or literary sense to refer to a search
for knowledge. - Author John Robinson notes: The emphasis here should be on intent - when Albert Pike
and other Masonic scholars spoke over a century ago about the ‗Luciferian path‘, or the ‗energies of
Lucifer‘, they were referring to the morning star, the light bearer, the search for light; the very antithesis of
dark, satanic evil. [5]
I disagree, as these kinds of arguments, are just forms of propaganda put out by guardians of the
fraternity, - these comments by the likes of Pike, Mackey and Taxil, were made around the mid to late
1880‘s, - and there is far too much evidence around today that in fact proves the likes Pike and Mackey
where referring to ―Lucifer‖ as in the Satanic – fallen angle reference and nothing else. I have even
personally seen and heard a Freemason 33rd Degree Shriner actually admit that he and his brethren do
indeed follow the Luciferian path and pray to Lucifer, and unwittingly disclosed this fact whilst
unknowingly being secretly filmed. But hearing and seeing this kind of confession isn‘t what convinced
me that some of them surely do revere a Satanic path, as there‘s an abundance of evidence that many of
them clearly do, and again I stress, - the majority of low level, and must be said gullible or rather not
know, Freemasons are ―unaware‖ of this.
Remember, I have nothing against Freemasonry in a sense, only against those people whom occupy the
same dark world that authors such as Dan Brown refers to in his interviews, - those who have been and still