25.06.2013 Views

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Calvin's concern here is soteriological: The flesh of Christ has been endowed<br />

with the life of the Godhead, the source of that life being ultimately God the Father. So<br />

endowed, the very flesh of Christ becomes an instrument by which life is communicated<br />

to believers, 638 and the efficacy of that communication—whether within the sacramental<br />

celebration or without—is the Spirit. Or, to render Calvin's metaphor banally, the Father<br />

is the font or source of the water, the Son the water itself, and the Spirit the channel<br />

through which that water flows. Though not in so few words, Calvin is declaring here<br />

with respect to the promise of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper that which he declared<br />

earlier with respect to the promise of the sacrament of baptism: "we clearly discern in<br />

the Father the cause, in the Son the matter, and in the Spirit the effect" of our<br />

quickening. Or, as he put it in the preamble to the exposition of the creed: "to the Father<br />

is attributed the beginning of activity, and the fountain and wellspring of all things; to<br />

the Son, wisdom, counsel, and the ordered disposition of all things; but to the Spirit is<br />

assigned the power and efficacy of that activity." 639 Again, these soteriological and<br />

sacramental claims stand in "explicit continuity." 640<br />

637 Institutio 1539, as in Inst. 1559 LCC 4.17.8-12, though the 1559 edition presents a<br />

rearrangement of this text. Italicized text in the quotation above offers a guide for reading, highlighting<br />

the metaphor of a spring (fons) and the Trinitarian movement of Calvin's thought. Battles' insertions of<br />

Biblical citations that Calvin himself did not include are omitted and paragraph breaks are set according<br />

to the 1539 edition.<br />

638 Davis suggests that Calvin's concept of the "instrumentality of Christ's flesh" doesn't develop<br />

until the 1550s, at the time Calvin published his commentary on the Gospel of John (1553) (Davis,<br />

Clearest Promises, 170-173). But does not this passage in the 1539 Institutio suggest Calvin has already<br />

then a clear conception of the "instrumentality of Christ's flesh"?<br />

639 Institutio 1539, as in Inst. 1559 LCC 1.13.18. "Quam tamen scripturis notatam distinctionem<br />

animadvertimus, subticeri non convenit. Ea autem est, quod patri principium agendi, rerumque omnium<br />

fons et scaturigo attribuitur; filio sapientia, consilium, ipsaque in rebus agendis dispensatio; at spiritui<br />

virtus et efficacia assignatur actionis" (CO 1:490).<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!