25.06.2013 Views

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This is the confession Bucer ratifies not only with a formidably large signature, but also<br />

with the following declaration:<br />

This statement of our dear brothers and colleagues, G. Farel, John Calvin, and P.<br />

Viret, we embrace as right doctrine, believing Christ our Lord in no sense to be<br />

diffused locally or ubiquitously in the Holy Supper, but that he has a true and<br />

finite body and remains in heavenly glory. Yet none the less, through his word<br />

and symbols, he is present in the Supper: He presents himself to us as we are by<br />

faith exalted to heaven with him, so that the bread we break and the cup through<br />

which we show Christ forth may be for us really the communion of his body and<br />

blood. Besides we hold as an error not to be tolerated in the Church that it is<br />

naked and bare signs that Christ sets forth in his blessed Supper, or not to<br />

believe that here the very body and the very blood of the Lord is received, that is<br />

the Lord himself true God and man.<br />

Written by his own hand—Martin Bucer.<br />

Subscribed—Wolfgang Capito. 940<br />

If the Holy Spirit is so integral to Bucer's doctrine of the Lord's Supper—as, for<br />

example, Willem Van't Spijker suggests 941 —why is it that Bucer (with Capito) fails to<br />

mention the Holy Spirit in both the brief confession he himself prepared and his<br />

addendum to the confession that the Genevans prepared? Why? Is he striving to satisfy<br />

939 Calvin: Theological Treatises, 168, with slight modification. "Nam utcunque nos in hac<br />

mortalitate peregrinantes in eodem loco cum mipso non includimur, aut continemur, nullis tamen finibus<br />

limitata est eius spiritus efficacia, quin vere copulare et in unum colligere posit, quae locorum spatiis sunt<br />

disiuncta. Ergo spiritum eius vinculum esse nostrae cum ipso particpationis agnoscimus, sed ita ut nos ille<br />

carnis et sanguinis Domini substantia vere ad immortalitatem pascat, et eorum participatione vivificet"<br />

(CO 9:711).<br />

940 Calvin: Theological Treatises, 169. "Hanc sententiam optimorum fratrum et symmystarum<br />

nostrorum G. Farelli, Io. Calvini atque P. Vireti, ut orthodoxam amplectimur, neque unquam sensi<br />

Christum Dominum in sacra coena praesentem localiter aut ubique diffusum: verum et finitum habet<br />

corpus et in gloria manet coelesti. In hac autem nihilominus est per verbum suum atque symbola : hic<br />

sistit se nobis cum ipso iam in coelestia per fidem sublevatis, ut panis quem frangimus, et calix per quem<br />

Christum praedicamus, sit nobis vere corporis et sanguinis eius communicatio. Praeterea ut errorem in<br />

ecclesia non ferendum agnoscimus, nuda et inania Christum statuere in sacra sua coena symbola, et non<br />

credere hic ipsum quoque corpus, et ipsum sanguinem Domini percipi, hoc est ipsum Dominum verum<br />

Deum et hominem. Martinus Bucerus sua manu scripsit. Wolfgangus Capito subscripsit" (CO 9:712).<br />

941 E.g., van't Spijker, "Bucer's Influence on Calvin: Church and Community," 33; van't Spijker,<br />

"The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit in Bucer and Calvin"; Willem van't Spijker, "Calvin's Friendship with<br />

Martin Bucer: Did It Make Calvin a Calvinist?" in Calvin and His Contemporaries: Colleagues, Friends,<br />

and Conflicts, Calvin Studies Society Papers 1997 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: CRC Product Services,<br />

1998), 174.<br />

287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!