25.06.2013 Views

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with respect to the Holy Spirit, which makes it ambiguous, just as well taken to mean<br />

"non-corporeally," or "not carnally," as "by the Spirit."<br />

In September 1536, Bucer published anew his gospels commentary, entitled In<br />

Sacra Quatuor Evangelia, Ennarationes. Its various changes included four sections<br />

headed with the term Retractatio: "retraction," or, to render it more moderately,<br />

"reconsideration." 924 As in the Defensio, Bucer is adamant that the signa exhibitiva are<br />

non nuda. 925 According to the fathers, these are sacramental signs, and as such they are<br />

exhibitive signs: the id is sisted with—such that the hands, so to speak, carry—what is<br />

924 A Retractatio de Coena Domini is inserted into his commentary on Matthew 26:26; a<br />

Retractatio is inserted at the outset of his commentary on John; a Retractatio is inserted at the outset of<br />

his exposition of John 6:63; and, finally, a Retractio is inserted into his De sacro baptismate tractatio<br />

found in his commentary on Matthew 3. Bucer eventually published "an enlarged German version of his<br />

retractions under the title Corrections (Verbesserung)" (Martin Greschat, Martin Bucer: A Reformer and<br />

His Times, trans. Stephen E. Buckwalter [Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004], 141).<br />

925 "Obiiciuntur. hic à nonnullis S. Patres. maxime. D. Aug. qui subinde panem signum corporis<br />

Domini vocent, & rem sacramenti huius signi ipsam faciant communionem, & concorporationem cum<br />

Domino, qua vivit ille in nobis, & nos in eo, qui denique affirment neminem revera corpus, & sanguinem<br />

Domini edere, nisi qui manserit in Domino, & habeat illum manentem in se. Scribunt quidem haec Patres,<br />

& clarissime omnium D. Agustinus: quòd enim ex pane, & vino aliud quam signa corporis, & sanguinis<br />

Domini faciant? Et cur id non potissimum in tractatione, huius sacramenti exprimant, cuius causa<br />

dicuntur et geruntur in sacra coena omnia? Totus sane sacramentorum usus huius gratia institutus est, ut<br />

Christo incorporemur, & in hac eius communione cotidie proficiamus. At ubi faciunt S. Patres signa<br />

sacramentalia signa Christi absentis, aut dicunt ita exhiberi hic nobis communionem Christi, eiusque<br />

incrementum, ut ipse nobis absit? Vocant S. Patres signa sacramentalia signa, sed intelligunt signa<br />

exhibitiva, quibus id sistitur, et quasi in manus traditur, quod illa significat. Quale signum non erat<br />

manuum impositio, & sufflatus in discipulos, quibus signis suam exhibebat benedictionem, & spiritum<br />

sanctum. Praecipuum cur se Dominus nobis in coena exhibet, docent merito S. Patres communicationem<br />

esse naturae eius, vitae eius, sed ob hanc ipsam communicationem ut vivat ille in nobis, & nos sibi<br />

incorporet, illi pleno ore praedicant, nos accipere in sacra coena carnem & sanguinem Domini, ipsumque<br />

se nobis in sacra coena vere exhibere. Cum itaque Dominus ipse dicit, Accipite, manducate, hoc est<br />

corpus meum, non hic est spiritus meus, virtus mea. Et Paulus. Panis quem frangimus nunquid est<br />

communicatio corporis Domini, non spiritus aut virtutis? Et omnis iam inde à tempore Apostolorum<br />

Ecclesia idem credit & praedicat cur non & ipsi crederemus & confiteremur simpliciter, in Eucharistia<br />

duas res esse: alteram coelestem corpus ipsum, & sanguinem Domini, Dominum ipsum: alteram<br />

terrenam, panem & vinum quae non nuda hic signa absentis Christi traduntur, sed cum quibus sistitur,<br />

traditur, & percipitur corpus, & sanguis Domini, Dominus ipse. Est. scribit. D. Augustinus, secundum<br />

quendam modum sacramentum corporis Christi, corpus Christi: Sacramentum sanguinis Christi, sangunis<br />

Christi. At secundum quem modum? ut significet tantum corpus & sanguinem domini absentia?" (Bucer,<br />

In Sacra Quator Evangelia, Ennarationes (1536). This is the passage here discussed, taken from the<br />

opening dedicatory letter, rendered exactly as it appears in The Digital Library of Classic Protestant Texts<br />

(Copyright © 2005 Alexander Street Press. L. L. C. and partners; www.alexanderstreetpress.com).<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!