25.06.2013 Views

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

THE PROVENANCE OF JOHN CALVIN'S EMPHASIS ON THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sacramental is equivalent merely to the visible or external use, when unbelief<br />

precludes access to the reality. Westphal, therefore, acts calumniously in<br />

charging our spiritual eating as a fallacious pretext for destroying the true<br />

communion which takes place in the Supper. For if spiritual is to be separated<br />

from sacramental eating, what are we to make of the following passage of<br />

Augustine? (In Psalm 98): You are not about to eat the body which you see and<br />

to drink the blood which those who are to crucify me will shed. I have committed<br />

a sacrament to you: when spiritually understood, it will give you life. Now, if it<br />

is clear that in the Supper, when the body is not spiritually eaten, nothing is left<br />

but a void and empty sign, and we infer from the words of Christ that spiritual<br />

eating takes place when faith corresponds to the mystical and spiritual doctrine,<br />

there is no ground for Westphal's attempt to dissever things which cannot be<br />

divided. I admit it to be certain that the same body which Christ offered on the<br />

cross is eaten, because we do not imagine that Christ has two bodies, nor is<br />

aliment for spiritual life to be sought anywhere else than in that victim. How<br />

does Augustine deny it to be the same body, but just in respect that having been<br />

received into heaven it inspires life into us by the secret virtue of the Spirit?<br />

Therefore a different mode of eating is denoted, viz., that though the body<br />

remains entire in heaven, it quickens us by its miraculous and heavenly virtue.<br />

In short, Augustine’s only reason for denying that the body on which the<br />

disciples were looking is given in the Supper, was to let us know that the mode<br />

of communion is not at all carnal, that we become partakers of flesh and blood<br />

in a mystery, our teeth not consuming that grace, as he elsewhere expresses it.<br />

Thus Westphal gains nothing by his quibbling. He is also detected in a manifest<br />

calumny, when he charges us with wresting this passage to mean that the Supper<br />

gives us nothing but an empty figure. 1062<br />

1062 Tracts and Treatises 2:374-75. "Etsi autem extra sacramenti usum spiritualiter Christo<br />

communicant fideles, aperte tamen testamur, Christum, qui coenam instituit, efficaciter per eam operari.<br />

Westphalo spiritualis manducatio ad fructum duntaxat restringitur, ut salus Christi morte parta ad nos<br />

perveniat. Sacramentalis, ut dixi, nihil aliud est. quam carnis Christi in ventrem ingurgitatio. Quid<br />

Augustinus? corpus sacramento tenus comedi docet dum re ipsa non comeditur. Duobus enim locis haec<br />

antithesis legitur apud eum expressa. Unde certo colligitur sacramentalem usum tantundem valere atque<br />

visibilem vel externum, ubi veritati aditum claudit hominum incredulitas. Itaque calumniose insimulat<br />

Westphalus nostrum de spirituali manducatione doctrinam, quasi fallaci praetextu veram<br />

communicationem tollat, quae in coena percipitur. Nam si ab esu sacramentali separandus est spiritualis,<br />

quid hoc sibi vult Augustini dictum*: Non hoc corpus quod videtis manducaturi estis, et bibituri<br />

sanguinem, quem fundent qui me crucifigent: sacramentum aliquod commendavi vobis, spiritualiter<br />

intellectum vivificabit vos. Iam si in coena praeter inane vacuumque signum nihil relinqui constat, ubi non<br />

spiritualiter editur corpus, et ex verbis Christi colligimus spiritualem esse esum, ubi fides mysticae et<br />

spirituali doctrinae respondet, non est quod res individuas divellere tentet Westphalus. Idem, fateor,<br />

Christi corpus quod in sacrificium Christus in cruce obtulit, manducari certum est, quia neque bicorporem<br />

fingimus Christum, neque aliunde quam ex victima illa alimentum ad spiritualem vitam petendum est.<br />

Quomodo idem esse corpus Augustinus negat, nisi quia in coelestem gloriam receptum arcana spiritus<br />

virtute vitam nobis inspirat? Diversus ergo edendi modus notatur: quia licet integrum maneat in coelo<br />

Christi corpus, mirabili tamen et coelesti virtute nos vivificat. Denique non alia de causa negat<br />

Augustinus dari in coena corpus illud, quod videbant discipuli, nisi ut sciamus minime carnalem esse<br />

communicationis modum: sed in mysterio nos fieri carnis et sanguinis participes, ut gratiam illam morsus<br />

nostri non consumant, ut alibi loquitur. Ideoque tergiversando nihil proficit Westphalus. In manifesta<br />

329

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!