28.06.2013 Views

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FISHERY BULLETIN OF THE FISH AND WILDLIFE BEBVICE 255<br />

measure, for <strong>the</strong> minor fluctuations in <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> runs from year<br />

to year <strong>and</strong> may be <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> bimodality in <strong>the</strong> runs. Regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon, it would seem that <strong>the</strong>re are two self-perpetuating components<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> red-salmon population in <strong>the</strong> watershed, <strong>and</strong> that each should be given<br />

adequate protection.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> 16 years under consideration <strong>the</strong> spring runs have ranged from 303,000<br />

fish in 1922 to 1,715,000 fish in 1926, <strong>the</strong> average being 817,000 fish. The fall runs<br />

have ranged from 652,000 fish in 1929 to 3,205,000 fish in 1926, <strong>the</strong> average being<br />

1,211,000 fish. The total run has-ranged from 1,058,000 fish in 1922 to 4,920,000<br />

fish in 1926, <strong>the</strong> average being 2,028,000 fish. Thus, <strong>the</strong>re has been a ra<strong>the</strong>r wide<br />

range in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> fish in thé runs from year to year, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> average run has been<br />

far below that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fishery when for a period <strong>of</strong> 7 years <strong>the</strong> catch<br />

alone exceeded <strong>the</strong> run (catch plus escapement) during this period by more than<br />

1,000,000 fish per year.<br />

RETURNS FROM KNOWN SPAWNING POPULATIONS<br />

In order to maintain <strong>the</strong> salmon runs at a high level, an adequate escapement<br />

must be obtained for each <strong>and</strong> every suitable spawning area. The question at once<br />

arises as to what constitutes an adequate escapement. This question has confronted<br />

<strong>the</strong> salmon conservationist since <strong>the</strong> first attempt was made to regulate a fishery, <strong>and</strong><br />

it is a question that still needs considerable study. Each small section <strong>of</strong> a spawning<br />

area must have its proper escapement, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> final analysis, it is necessary to<br />

determine, for each small area, <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> an adequate spawning population. The<br />

problem is fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated because an adequate spawning population for a given<br />

spawning area is not necessarily constant. Variations in meteorological conditions<br />

result in changes in environmental conditions on <strong>the</strong> spawning grounds during <strong>the</strong><br />

spawning <strong>and</strong> incubation periods from year to year, consequently, a spawning escapement<br />

which may be adequate in one year may be inadequate, or may be more than<br />

adequate, in some o<strong>the</strong>r year. As <strong>the</strong>re is no means <strong>of</strong> predicting what meteorological<br />

conditions will prevail during <strong>the</strong> spawning season <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent incubation<br />

period, we can at best determine an average figure for <strong>the</strong> optimum size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spawning<br />

population for each spawning area.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> progeny from a year's spawning population <strong>of</strong> Karluk red salmon<br />

return as adults in <strong>the</strong>ir fourth to seventh year. 8 In order to determine <strong>the</strong> return<br />

from <strong>the</strong> spawning <strong>of</strong> 1930, for example, it is necessary to determine <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

4-year fish in <strong>the</strong> run <strong>of</strong> 1934, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> 5-year fish in <strong>the</strong> run <strong>of</strong> 1935, <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6-year fish hi <strong>the</strong> run <strong>of</strong> 1936, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> 7-year fish in <strong>the</strong> run <strong>of</strong> 1937.<br />

The numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se several groups are <strong>the</strong>n added toge<strong>the</strong>r to determine <strong>the</strong> total<br />

return from <strong>the</strong> spawning <strong>of</strong> 1930. The returns from <strong>the</strong> escapements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spring<br />

run, from <strong>the</strong> fall run, <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> total run <strong>of</strong> each year are given in table 20.<br />

The escapement <strong>of</strong> 1921 (1,500,000 fish) produced a very good return both in фе<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> return to escapement <strong>and</strong> also hi <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> fish produced. While <strong>the</strong><br />

return from <strong>the</strong> spring escapement was good, <strong>the</strong> return from <strong>the</strong> fall escapement was<br />

much better <strong>and</strong> was largely responsible for <strong>the</strong> exceptionally good total return.<br />

• There are a few 8-year <strong>and</strong> 8-year Bah In tue Karluk runs whicb are Included In tfoe tabulations, bet <strong>the</strong>ir presence Is quite<br />

unimportant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!