Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WHITEFISH FISHERY OF LAKES HURON AND MICHIGAN<br />
WHITEFISH FISHERY OF LAKE HURON, 1940-1942<br />
The downward trend in <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> whitefish in <strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Michigan waters<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lake Huron which got under way in 1933, <strong>and</strong> in 1939 had carried <strong>the</strong> annual yield<br />
to less than half <strong>the</strong> previously recorded minimum (555,000 pounds in 1900), continued<br />
through 1940-1942 (table 52 <strong>of</strong> this appendix—for fur<strong>the</strong>r data on production see also<br />
table 1 <strong>of</strong> part I, tables 3, 4; 5, <strong>and</strong> 6 <strong>of</strong> part II, <strong>and</strong> appendix B). The production <strong>of</strong><br />
95,000 pounds in 1942 amounted to only 4 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1929-1939 average for Lake<br />
Huron, 45 <strong>and</strong> was only 2 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1931 maximum yield. Aside from unimportant<br />
increases in H-2, H-3, <strong>and</strong> H-6 in 1942 <strong>the</strong> trend was downward in all districts during<br />
<strong>the</strong> 3-year period.<br />
With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> H-l, where <strong>the</strong> production percentages ranged from 16 to 26,<br />
<strong>the</strong> 1940-1942 yields <strong>of</strong> all districts amounted to only 7 percent (H-2 in 1940) or less <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> 1929-1939 mean. The 1942 production was nil in H-5, a district that yielded<br />
1,676,000 pounds <strong>of</strong> whitefish in 1933.<br />
H-l accounted for 65.2 to 83.5 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total whitefish yield <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lake in<br />
1940-1942. The only o<strong>the</strong>r district that yielded as much as 10 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total in<br />
a single.year was H-4 (1940 <strong>and</strong> 1941). The dominance <strong>of</strong> H-l in this limited fishery<br />
was even more pronounced than in <strong>the</strong> early years, 1891-1908.<br />
The progressive decline in production in <strong>the</strong> years, 1940-1942, can be attributed to<br />
a continued general decrease in fishing intensity (tables 53 <strong>and</strong> 54:—-see tables 8 <strong>and</strong><br />
H-l<br />
H-2<br />
H-3<br />
TABLE 53 —Annual fluctuations in <strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fishery for whitefish in each district<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lake Huron, 194Q-19J&<br />
District<br />
1940<br />
54<br />
28<br />
(')<br />
[Expressed аз percentages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average 1929-1939 intensity in <strong>the</strong> district]<br />
Intensity'as percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
mean for district<br />
1941<br />
48 7<br />
0<br />
1942<br />
23 43<br />
District<br />
l<br />
H-4<br />
H-5<br />
H-6<br />
--<br />
1 Inadequate data.<br />
' No production. ,<br />
1940<br />
36<br />
18<br />
14<br />
Intensity as percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
mean for district<br />
TABLE 54.—Annual fluctuations in <strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whitefish fishery for all six districts <strong>of</strong> Lake Huron<br />
combined (third row from bottom <strong>of</strong> right half <strong>of</strong> table) <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> each year's intensity among <strong>the</strong> districts<br />
H-I<br />
H-2<br />
[The average annual intensity for <strong>the</strong> entire lake, 1929-1939, is 100.0. In paren<strong>the</strong>ses are <strong>the</strong> intensity values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dcep-trap-net fishery.<br />
The value <strong>of</strong> one unit is 1/1,100 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total expected oatch <strong>of</strong> all districts, 1929-1939]<br />
District or area<br />
Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Lake Huron (H-l <strong>and</strong><br />
H-2)<br />
H-3<br />
H-4<br />
Central Lake Huron (H-3 <strong>and</strong> H-4)<br />
1 Inadequate data.<br />
' No production.<br />
Intensity as percentage <strong>of</strong> .<br />
mean for entire lake<br />
1940<br />
1 11.3<br />
1 (5.1)<br />
! - 7<br />
í<br />
\ (1.7)<br />
1 13.0<br />
1 (6.8)<br />
ÕT<br />
8.2<br />
(7.2)<br />
f 8.2<br />
\ (7.2)<br />
1941<br />
8.1<br />
(3.2)<br />
0.5<br />
(0.5)<br />
8.6<br />
(3.7J<br />
~' ОГ<br />
3.Î<br />
(2.6)<br />
3.1<br />
(2.6)<br />
1942<br />
4.8<br />
(1.5)<br />
0.2<br />
(0.2)<br />
5.0<br />
(1.7)<br />
0.1<br />
(0.0)<br />
2.0<br />
(1.8)<br />
2.1<br />
(1.8)<br />
H-5<br />
District or area<br />
H-6 - - . ...<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Lake Huron (H-5 <strong>and</strong><br />
H-6)<br />
Lake Huron (all 6 districts)<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> intensity represented<br />
1941<br />
13 1<br />
3<br />
1942<br />
9<br />
)<br />
2<br />
( !<br />
Intensity as percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
mean for entire lake<br />
1940<br />
1 3.6<br />
I (3.6)<br />
í 3.9<br />
\ (3.8)<br />
1 7.5<br />
\ (7.4)<br />
/ 28.7<br />
t (21.4)<br />
« In this appendix as in part II referenda to "Lake Huron," "Lake Michigan," "<strong>the</strong> entire lake," or "<strong>the</strong> lake" should be understood to mean<br />
<strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Michigan waters only, unless o<strong>the</strong>rwise specified<br />
74.6<br />
1941<br />
0.1<br />
(0.1)<br />
0.8<br />
(0.7)<br />
0.9<br />
(0.8)<br />
12.6<br />
(7.1)<br />
56.3<br />
389<br />
1942<br />
(=)<br />
0.6<br />
(0.5)<br />
0.6<br />
(0.5)<br />
7.7<br />
(4.0)<br />
51.9