28.06.2013 Views

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

352 FISHERY BULLETIN OF THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE<br />

were in <strong>the</strong> same interval (81-90 feet). The strongest indication <strong>of</strong> two concentration<br />

zones <strong>of</strong> illegal fish is found in <strong>the</strong> scanty September data. Young whitefish were much<br />

scarcer in <strong>the</strong> shallower water <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> .Saginaw Bay area than at corresponding depths<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Alpena-Ossineke grounds.<br />

HARBOR BEACH GROUNDS<br />

The observations <strong>of</strong> 55 lifts <strong>of</strong> deep trap nets <strong>of</strong>f Harbor Beach (no pound nets<br />

were observed here) were all made in <strong>the</strong> latter part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1932 season (table 26),<br />

when on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> preceding data <strong>the</strong> whitefish would be expected to be concentrated<br />

in <strong>the</strong> deeper water. Actually here is where <strong>the</strong> deep trap nets were found<br />

in operation. Fifty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lifts were made from depths greater than 90 feet. Consequently,<br />

no detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vertical distribution <strong>of</strong> whitefish at all depths<br />

in this area is possible. The maximum concentration <strong>of</strong> both legal <strong>and</strong> illegal whitefish<br />

occurred in <strong>the</strong> 101-110 foot interval in all three months. In <strong>the</strong> season's average <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> legal fish per lift was greater at 91-100 feet than in waters deeper than 110<br />

feet, but <strong>the</strong> reverse relationship was found in <strong>the</strong> data for illegal whitefish. The single<br />

shallow-water lift (41-60 feet) contained no whitefish. The legal whitefish were more<br />

abundant than <strong>the</strong> illegal fish at all depths.<br />

Au st<br />

October<br />

Au t<br />

September<br />

October<br />

TABLE 26.—Number <strong>of</strong> legal <strong>and</strong> illegal whitefish per lift <strong>of</strong> deep trap nets <strong>of</strong>f Harbor Beach, 1932<br />

[Number <strong>of</strong> lifts in paren<strong>the</strong>ses. Asterisks indicate concentrations]<br />

Month<br />

Month<br />

41-60<br />

( 0.0<br />

\ U)<br />

/ 00<br />

1 (1)<br />

41-60<br />

( 0.0<br />

t (D<br />

/ 0.0<br />

\ (1)<br />

61-70 71-80<br />

61-70<br />

===<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> legal whitefish per lift at depth fin feet)<br />

101.0<br />

(1)<br />

101.0<br />

(1)<br />

81-90<br />

42.0<br />

(3)<br />

42.0<br />

(3)<br />

91-100<br />

f 251.0<br />

i (D<br />

270.5<br />

(8)<br />

J 62.5<br />

i (2)<br />

231.5<br />

(11)<br />

101-110<br />

420.5«<br />

(2)<br />

291.7*<br />

(12)<br />

117.3*<br />

(3)<br />

276.1*<br />

(17)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> illegal whitefish per lift at depth (in feet)<br />

71-80<br />

65.0<br />

(D<br />

65 0<br />

(1)<br />

81-90<br />

33.3<br />

(3)<br />

33.3<br />

(3)<br />

91-100<br />

/ 150.0<br />

i (D<br />

73.2<br />

(8)<br />

f 32.0<br />

\ (2)<br />

72.7<br />

(И)<br />

101-110<br />

298.0*-<br />

(2)<br />

167.2*<br />

(12)<br />

67.7*<br />

(3)<br />

165.0*<br />

(17)<br />

111-120<br />

408.3<br />

(4)<br />

134.2<br />

(6)<br />

34.5<br />

(2)<br />

208.9<br />

(12)<br />

111-120<br />

266 '. a<br />

(4)<br />

67.7<br />

(6)<br />

32.0<br />

(2)<br />

128.1 '•<br />

(12)<br />

BATHYMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF WHITEFISH IN LAKE MICHIGAN<br />

GREEN BAY AREA (MARINETTE, ESCANABA, AND FAIRPORT)<br />

The 30 lifts <strong>of</strong> pound nets <strong>and</strong> deep trap nets observed in <strong>the</strong> Green Bay area do<br />

not <strong>of</strong>fer adequate information on <strong>the</strong> bathymétrie distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whitefish at any<br />

one time or on <strong>the</strong> seasonal movements <strong>of</strong> whitefish. The data <strong>of</strong> table 27, however,<br />

indicate ra<strong>the</strong>r clearly that legal whitefish in this region were in deeper water in September<br />

(61-^80 feet) than in May (60 feet <strong>and</strong> less). Illegal whitefish were relatively<br />

numerous in May at depths less than 61 feet, <strong>and</strong> were present in large numbers also in<br />

<strong>the</strong> two lifts from <strong>the</strong> 81-90 foot interval. Few illegal whitefish were taken at any<br />

depth in September.<br />

>12Û<br />

135 8<br />

(5)<br />

163.0<br />

(3)<br />

46.0<br />

(2)<br />

Í2ÍÕ<br />

(10)<br />

>120<br />

79.0<br />

(5)<br />

75.3<br />

(3)<br />

55.5<br />

(2)<br />

73.2<br />

(10)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!