Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
332 FISHERY BULLETIN OF THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE<br />
TABLE 12.—Monthly production <strong>of</strong> whitefish in 'Lake Huron, 1929 <strong>and</strong> 1931, in gill nets, deep trap nets,<br />
pound nets, <strong>and</strong> all gears combined<br />
Gear<br />
1919<br />
Gill net<br />
Deep trap net-<br />
All gears<br />
19S1<br />
Gill net<br />
Deep trap net.<br />
All gears<br />
Jan.<br />
/ 180<br />
\ (0.0)<br />
I 180<br />
\ (0.0)<br />
/ 390<br />
\ (0.1)<br />
/ 390<br />
\ (0.0)<br />
Feb.<br />
580<br />
(O.I)<br />
580<br />
(0.0)<br />
317<br />
(0.1)<br />
2<br />
1 (0.0)<br />
319<br />
(0.0)<br />
March<br />
2,465<br />
(0.5)<br />
2,468<br />
(0.2)<br />
4,663<br />
(0.7)<br />
55<br />
(0.0)<br />
4,785<br />
(0.1)<br />
April<br />
52,029<br />
(10.6)<br />
f 1,239<br />
\ (1.4)<br />
/ 1,278<br />
\ «U)<br />
57,764<br />
• (4.0)<br />
82,423<br />
(13.3)<br />
í 19,220<br />
1 (0.9)<br />
3,340<br />
(0.4)<br />
116,754<br />
(2.8)<br />
[Percentages are in paren<strong>the</strong>ses]<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> whitensh in pounds in month<br />
May<br />
04,066<br />
(19.2)<br />
1,774<br />
(2.0)<br />
19,582<br />
(2.4)<br />
117,463<br />
(8.1)<br />
124,071<br />
(20.0)<br />
115,241<br />
(5.6)<br />
41,882<br />
(4.6)<br />
289,342<br />
(7.0)<br />
June<br />
79,724<br />
(16.3)<br />
10,867<br />
(12.5)<br />
101,424<br />
(12.3)<br />
193,906<br />
(13.3)<br />
112,776<br />
(18.2)<br />
334,943<br />
(16.1)<br />
269,224<br />
(29.5)<br />
808,065<br />
(19.5)<br />
July<br />
82,332/<br />
(16.8)<br />
20,535<br />
(23.6)<br />
165,066<br />
(20.0)<br />
276,917<br />
(19.0)<br />
113,365<br />
(18.3)<br />
528,609<br />
(25.4)<br />
169,001<br />
(18.5)<br />
961,095<br />
(23.2)<br />
Aug.<br />
88,890<br />
(18.2)<br />
15,068<br />
(17.3)<br />
33,145<br />
(4.0)<br />
137,161<br />
(9.4)<br />
107,329<br />
(17.3)<br />
498,984<br />
(24.0)<br />
53,513<br />
(5.9)<br />
709,469<br />
(17.2)<br />
Sept.<br />
58,534<br />
(12.0)<br />
9,809<br />
HI.«<br />
163,763<br />
(19.9)<br />
233,074<br />
(16.0)<br />
36,492<br />
(5.9)<br />
391,921<br />
(18.8)<br />
65,801<br />
(7.2)<br />
591,894<br />
(14.3)<br />
Oct.<br />
21,744<br />
(4.4)<br />
24,061<br />
(27.6)<br />
244,055<br />
(29.6)<br />
302,087<br />
(20.7)<br />
7,752<br />
(1.2)<br />
172,701<br />
(8.3)<br />
184,552<br />
(20.3)<br />
441,501<br />
(10.7)<br />
Nov.<br />
8,848<br />
(1.8)<br />
3,768<br />
(4.3)<br />
91,878<br />
(11.2)<br />
130,694<br />
(9.0)<br />
' 9,001<br />
(1.5)<br />
15,757<br />
(0.8)<br />
121,774<br />
(13.4)<br />
186,997<br />
(4.5)<br />
Dec.<br />
569<br />
(0.1)<br />
3,505<br />
(0.4)<br />
4,074<br />
(0.3)<br />
20,936<br />
(3.4)<br />
2,220<br />
(0.1)<br />
1,796<br />
(0.2)<br />
29,161<br />
(0.7)<br />
Total<br />
489,961<br />
(100.0)<br />
87,121<br />
(100.0)<br />
623,696<br />
(100.0)<br />
1,456,068<br />
(100.0)<br />
619,515<br />
(100.0)<br />
2,079,590<br />
(100.0)<br />
910,940<br />
(100.0)<br />
4,139,772<br />
(100.0)<br />
only during limited periods, one in late spring <strong>and</strong> early summer <strong>and</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r in midautumn.<br />
Many fishermen discontinue pound-net operations at o<strong>the</strong>r seasons. It is<br />
true also that even in periods <strong>of</strong> active operation <strong>the</strong> greatest concentrations <strong>of</strong> whitefish<br />
may be at depths beyond <strong>the</strong> reach <strong>of</strong> pound nets.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>fshore movement that leads to a concentration in relatively deep,water in<br />
<strong>the</strong> summer <strong>and</strong> early autumn exposes <strong>the</strong> whitefish to <strong>the</strong> inroads <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deep trap net<br />
at <strong>the</strong> time it is most vulnerable. Formerly, <strong>the</strong> only toll on <strong>the</strong> whitefish in its summer<br />
concentration was that levied by gill nets, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> modern fishery <strong>of</strong> Lake Huron this<br />
type <strong>of</strong> gear has not proved generally effective for <strong>the</strong> large-scale catching <strong>of</strong> whitefish.<br />
The gill net is so ineffective for <strong>the</strong> capture <strong>of</strong> whitefish under modern conditions that<br />
gill-net fisheries are supported by this species alone only in very limited areas or over<br />
extremely short periods <strong>of</strong> time (chiefly during <strong>the</strong> spawning season). 26 The largemesh<br />
gill-net fishery is now conducted ordinarily for <strong>the</strong> capture <strong>of</strong> both trout <strong>and</strong><br />
whitefish or <strong>of</strong> trout alone, but very seldom exclusively for <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> whitefish. 27<br />
The comparative ineffectiveness <strong>of</strong> gill nets made <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> summer concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> whitefish a "semi-closed" season during which <strong>the</strong> species was in large measure<br />
immune to capture. The introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deep trap net made this same period <strong>the</strong><br />
season <strong>of</strong> maximum production.<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deep-trap-net fishery on <strong>the</strong> monthly distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whitefish<br />
catch <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> high production this gear made possible in <strong>the</strong> summer months may be<br />
illustrated by <strong>the</strong> data <strong>of</strong> table 12 <strong>and</strong> figure 12. The gill-net season extended through<br />
<strong>the</strong> months, May-August, in both 1929 <strong>and</strong> 1931. (September was a fairly good month<br />
in 1929.) No distinct peaks occurred in ei<strong>the</strong>r year. The pound-net catch, on <strong>the</strong><br />
contrary, was divided into two distinct seasons, each with a sharp peak. The earlyseason<br />
maximum occurred in July in 1929 <strong>and</strong> in June in 1931. Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> autumn<br />
maxima were in October. The 1931 data which show <strong>the</strong> more pronounced summer<br />
depression provide <strong>the</strong> better description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monthly distribution <strong>of</strong> pound-net production<br />
because <strong>the</strong> 1929 early-summer peak was later <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> September catch was<br />
relatively higher than usual. The data for both years, however, have a distinct latesummer<br />
minimum—August in 1929 <strong>and</strong> August-September in 1931.<br />
The curve <strong>of</strong> total catch in 1929 has a minimum in August corresponding to <strong>the</strong><br />
August depression in <strong>the</strong> pound-net data. A similar minimum would have existed in<br />
* When gill nets «ere fished on <strong>the</strong> spawning grounds <strong>the</strong> catches «ere sometimes enormous—thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> pounds m a single lift.<br />
» ТЫ» statement holds true even In Lake Michigan where <strong>the</strong> gill net is normally <strong>the</strong> dominant gear for <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> whitefish.