Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
386 FISHERY BULLETIN OF THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE<br />
Production was still high in 1931; however, <strong>the</strong> years, 1932-1939, comprised a period<br />
<strong>of</strong> rapid decline. The 1939 catch <strong>of</strong> 27,200 pounds was <strong>the</strong> lowest since 1918.<br />
Lake Michigan.—The Lake Michigan data are much more variable than those for<br />
Green Bay, <strong>and</strong> it is correspondingly difficult to speak <strong>of</strong> definite periods <strong>of</strong> high or<br />
low production. Frequently exceptionally good or poor years are isolated (as, for<br />
example, 1892 <strong>and</strong> 1931). The period <strong>of</strong> most consistently low production was 1909-<br />
1916 (all years below 100,000 pounds) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> most extended era <strong>of</strong> heavy yield was<br />
1917-1923 (all but two years above 100,000 pounds). The best <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more recent<br />
years was 1931 with a catch <strong>of</strong> 236,000 pounds. The 1931 catch was exceeded by that<br />
<strong>of</strong> only one year (1923) since 1897 <strong>and</strong> was <strong>the</strong> fourth highest in <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
fishery. Production was consistently below 100,000 pounds in <strong>the</strong> years, 1932-1939<br />
(no data for 1935). '<br />
Green Bay <strong>and</strong> Lake Michigan.—The data for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin waters<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lake Michigan show a fairly consistent high level <strong>of</strong> yield for <strong>the</strong> years, 1889-1897.<br />
Available data indicate a relatively low production in <strong>the</strong> period, 1899-1917; only<br />
once (1912) did <strong>the</strong> catch exceed 150,000 pounds in <strong>the</strong> 11 years for which <strong>the</strong>re are<br />
records, <strong>and</strong> it fell below 100,000 pounds in 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m (1910 <strong>and</strong> 1914). An upturn<br />
occurred in 1918. Over <strong>the</strong> period, 1918-1925, production fell below 200,000 pounds<br />
only twice (1920 <strong>and</strong> 1922) <strong>and</strong> exceeded 400,000 pounds in 1923. A still higher level<br />
was maintained during <strong>the</strong> six years, 1926-1931. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual yields were above<br />
300,000 pounds <strong>and</strong> 3 years had catches in excess <strong>of</strong> 500,000 pounds. The 1931 take<br />
<strong>of</strong> 698,000 pounds was <strong>the</strong> largest since 1897 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> second largest in history. Production<br />
was at a relatively low level in <strong>the</strong> years, 1932-1939. The catch exceeded<br />
200,000 pounds in only two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se years (1932 <strong>and</strong> 1935). The 1934 catch was <strong>the</strong><br />
lowest since 1914 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> third lowest on record.<br />
A striking feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin data is <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> agreement between<br />
<strong>the</strong> statistics for Green Bay <strong>and</strong> Lake Michigan. Some years were good or poor<br />
in both areas, as for example, 1897, 1931, <strong>and</strong> 1934. It is true also that <strong>the</strong> data for<br />
<strong>the</strong> two areas occasionally agreed ra<strong>the</strong>r well in general trend over a period <strong>of</strong> several<br />
years as in 1909-1917 <strong>and</strong> 1931-1934. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re were numerous years<br />
that had a very high catch in one area <strong>and</strong> exceptionally poor production in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
Outst<strong>and</strong>ing examples <strong>of</strong> such disagreements occurred over <strong>the</strong> period, 1890-1896, <strong>and</strong><br />
in <strong>the</strong> years 1918, 1923, 1926, 1929, <strong>and</strong> 1930.<br />
POUND-NET AND DEEP-TRAP-NET FISHERY, 1930-1931<br />
Table 50 contains data on <strong>the</strong> pound-net <strong>and</strong> deep-trap-net fisheries for whitefish<br />
in Door County waters, 1930-1931. (Practically all <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin's whitefish are pro-.<br />
duced in <strong>the</strong>se waters.) The comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average catch per lift <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two gears<br />
in corresponding months confirms <strong>the</strong> contention <strong>of</strong> fishermen that <strong>the</strong> deep trap net is<br />
<strong>the</strong> more effective gear. The catch per lift <strong>of</strong> deep trap nets was 2.7 times that <strong>of</strong><br />
pound nets in May 1931, 2.2 times in June, <strong>and</strong> 2.3 times for May <strong>and</strong> June com-<br />
•<br />
May<br />
Date or period<br />
1930<br />
May <strong>and</strong> June<br />
Í9S1<br />
April ^<br />
May<br />
June<br />
July<br />
May <strong>and</strong> June . .<br />
TABLE 50.—Production <strong>of</strong> whitefish <strong>and</strong> catch per lift in pound nets <strong>and</strong> deep trap nets<br />
<strong>of</strong> Door County, Wis., 1030-1931<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> lifts<br />
265<br />
595<br />
860<br />
253<br />
391<br />
644<br />
Found net<br />
Production<br />
'(pounds)<br />
23,427<br />
85,546<br />
108,973<br />
21,524<br />
66,364<br />
87,888<br />
Catch per lift<br />
(pounds)<br />
88 4<br />
143 7<br />
126.7<br />
85 1<br />
169 7<br />
136.4<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> lifts<br />
17<br />
130<br />
184<br />
43<br />
374<br />
314<br />
Deep trap net<br />
Production<br />
(pounds)<br />
803<br />
29652<br />
69,359<br />
11,509<br />
111 323<br />
99,011<br />
Catch per lift<br />
(pounds)<br />
47.2<br />
228.1<br />
376.4<br />
267.6<br />
297 3<br />
315.3