28.06.2013 Views

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

Fishery bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART III<br />

BATHYMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF WHITEFISH AND OF CERTAIN<br />

OTHER SPECIES IN THE SHALLOWER WATERS OF<br />

LAKES HURON AND MICHIGAN<br />

The following sections are based on counts <strong>of</strong> whiteflsh <strong>and</strong> certain o<strong>the</strong>r species<br />

in 456 lifts <strong>of</strong> pound nets <strong>and</strong> deep trap nets in Lake Huron <strong>and</strong> 380 lifts in Lake<br />

Michigan in <strong>the</strong> years, 1931-1932. The original compilations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data were much<br />

more detailed than those presented here. The tables showing <strong>the</strong> bathymétrie distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fish represent combinations <strong>of</strong> large-mesh (4 inches <strong>and</strong> larger, stretched<br />

measure) <strong>and</strong> small-mesh (less than 4 inches) nets <strong>of</strong> different dimensions, <strong>of</strong> different<br />

fishing grounds in <strong>the</strong> same general area, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> data for corresponding months in 1931<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1932. However, <strong>the</strong>se combinations were made only after a careful examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material demonstrated that <strong>the</strong> condensed data did not lead to conclusions that<br />

were at variance with those that would have been drawn from more detailed information.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> main, <strong>the</strong>, data have been compiled according to 10-foot depth intervals.<br />

However, for species o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> yellow pike, all lifts <strong>of</strong> nets from depths <strong>of</strong> 40 feet<br />

<strong>and</strong> less have been combined, as have also those from 41-60 feet. In deep water<br />

all lifts from more than 120 feet (more than 110 feet in Lake Michigan) have been<br />

combined. The greatest depth in which a deep trap net was set, so far as we know,<br />

was about 160 feet. This net was set in Lake Huron. Seldom were deep trap nets<br />

placed in water deeper than 140 feet. In Lake Michigan <strong>the</strong> whitefish grounds were<br />

located in much shallower water. - Although a few pound nets set in more than 60 feet<br />

<strong>of</strong> water were visited <strong>and</strong> a few deep-trap-net lifts from depths <strong>of</strong> 60 feet or less were<br />

observed, for practical purposes <strong>the</strong> 60-foot contour may be considered as <strong>the</strong> line <strong>of</strong><br />

separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> gear. The change from pound nets to deep trap nets at<br />

a depth <strong>of</strong> about 60 feet should not affect <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data, since we did not find<br />

any important differences in <strong>the</strong> catch <strong>of</strong> pound nets <strong>and</strong> deep trap nets that were<br />

fished in <strong>the</strong> same depth <strong>of</strong> water. All lifts observed from depths <strong>of</strong> more than 120<br />

feet were made in Lake Huron.<br />

As a convenience in reading <strong>the</strong> tables, asterisks have been employed to designate<br />

those depth intervals that contained <strong>the</strong> more significant peak concentrations <strong>of</strong> fish.<br />

As an additional convenience, whitefish <strong>and</strong> yellow pike frequently will be termed<br />

merely "legal" <strong>and</strong> "illegal" fish on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> a 2-pound <strong>and</strong> l^-pound size limit,<br />

respectively, which limits were in effect in Michigan at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> investigation.<br />

BATHYMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF WHITEFISH IN LAKE HURON<br />

NORTHERN LAKE HURON (CHEBOYGAN AND ROGERS CITY)<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> lifts (20) <strong>of</strong> pound nets <strong>and</strong> deep trap nets observed in nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Lake Huron was insufficient to provide reliable data on <strong>the</strong> bathymétrie distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> whitefish. The largest lifts <strong>of</strong> legal-sized whitefish were taken from depths <strong>of</strong> 71-80<br />

feet in July <strong>and</strong> August <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> 61-70 feet in September (table 23). The greatest<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> illegal-sized fish occurred in lifts from 71-80 <strong>and</strong> 91-100 feet. (Only<br />

one lift from <strong>the</strong> latter depth was observed.)<br />

ALPENA-OSSINEKE GROUNDS<br />

Although a fairly large number (158) <strong>of</strong> pound-net <strong>and</strong> deep-trap-net lifts was<br />

examined on <strong>the</strong> Alpena <strong>and</strong> Ossineke grounds, <strong>the</strong> scarcity <strong>of</strong> data for <strong>the</strong> shallower<br />

water makes a detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> depth distribution <strong>of</strong> whitefish in this area<br />

impossible (table 24). Nearly half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lifts were from depths <strong>of</strong> 111-120 feet <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!