14.07.2013 Views

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11<br />

CHAPTER 4<br />

Irrigation efficiency was defined by the American Society of Civil Engineers’ On-Farm<br />

Irrigation Committee in 1978 as the ratio of the volume of <strong>water</strong> which is beneficially used <strong>to</strong> the<br />

volume of <strong>irrigation</strong> <strong>water</strong> applied. Beneficial uses may include crop evapotranspiration, deep<br />

percolation needed for leaching for salt control, crop cooling, frost control, and as an aid in certain<br />

cultural operations.<br />

There are many specific mathematical definitions of efficiency in use. Differences in definitions<br />

are due primarily <strong>to</strong>:<br />

1. Accounting for runoff and deep percolation.<br />

2. Whether it is for an individual <strong>irrigation</strong> or an entire season.<br />

3. Whether it is for an individual farm, <strong>irrigation</strong> project, or basin.<br />

Many people will hold <strong>to</strong> a strict measure of efficiency considering only the beneficial use on the<br />

individual field. Others will classify reuse of any surface or sub-surface drainage by other farms as<br />

beneficial use. Some will ignore measurements of individual <strong>irrigation</strong>s <strong>to</strong> focus on a seasonal<br />

efficiency. For the Manual, application efficiency is defined for each <strong>irrigation</strong> as:<br />

Applied <strong>water</strong> s<strong>to</strong>red in the root zone or used for leaching<br />

Application Efficiency = ............................................................................................ x 100<br />

Total <strong>water</strong> applied<br />

Application efficiencies are also expressed as a percentage between 0 and 100%. A 100%<br />

application efficiency is not theoretically attainable due <strong>to</strong> immediate evaporation losses during<br />

<strong>irrigation</strong>s. However, there could easily be close <strong>to</strong> 95% application efficiency if a crop is under<strong>water</strong>ed.<br />

In this case, assuming there was no deep percolation, all <strong>water</strong> applied and not immediately<br />

evaporated would be used by the crop.<br />

Under<strong>water</strong>ing a crop will theoretically result in a high application efficiency. However, it may<br />

not be a very effective way of farming and could actually lead <strong>to</strong> an overall inefficient use of resources.<br />

This could be because of an inefficient use of fertilizer, a weak crop that is more susceptible<br />

<strong>to</strong> pest pressures, thus requiring additional chemical applications, or sub-standard yields that would<br />

require additional cropped acreage.<br />

Note that the terms “<strong>irrigation</strong> efficiency” or “application efficiency” should not be confused with<br />

the term “<strong>water</strong> use efficiency” (WUE). Water use efficiency is generally a measure of yield per unit<br />

<strong>water</strong> applied.<br />

Relationships Between Distribution Uniformity and Application Efficiency<br />

Generally, the distribution uniformity of the <strong>irrigation</strong> system is the first concern. The reason for<br />

this is explained by the following four graphs. They are a profile view of two adjacent sprinklers in a<br />

field and the root zone under them. The spray patterns from the adjacent sprinklers must overlap <strong>to</strong><br />

result in the same amount of <strong>water</strong> falling in all parts of the field. The horizontal, dashed line in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!