14.07.2013 Views

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

35<br />

CHAPTER 4<br />

Description<br />

The term “dual <strong>irrigation</strong> systems” may be applied <strong>to</strong> a number of situations. Casual<br />

observations or a formal <strong>irrigation</strong> system evaluation (IP 2.01.03) may indicate that the<br />

one <strong>irrigation</strong> system in use is very inefficient at certain times in the season due <strong>to</strong> soil,<br />

crop, or climatic conditions. Thus, another type of <strong>irrigation</strong> system, or a temporary<br />

modification <strong>to</strong> the current system may be in order during these periods. Two of the<br />

more common situations would be:<br />

1. A hand-line or solid-set sprinkle system and a furrow/rill or border strip system used<br />

on the same field in the same season. In this case the sprinkler system is used for<br />

pre-<strong>irrigation</strong>s, germination, and possibly early, light, seasonal <strong>irrigation</strong>s. Sprinkle<br />

systems allow better control of the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>water</strong> application. This may be required by<br />

the frequent, light applications during germination. Also, some soils will have very<br />

high infiltration rates early in a season. The sprinkle system maintains high<br />

application efficiency in a situation where <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>water</strong> applications would be hard<br />

<strong>to</strong> control with the furrow/rill system.<br />

2. Temporary use of portable gated pipe <strong>to</strong> reduce the run length of a furrow/rill<br />

<strong>irrigation</strong> system. Again, when soil infiltration rates are high, or smaller <strong>water</strong><br />

applications are required, shorter furrow lengths make it easier <strong>to</strong> maintain<br />

acceptable application efficiencies.<br />

In both of the situations described above, the portable pipe, either sprinkler or gated pipe,<br />

is removed at some time during the season and <strong>irrigation</strong>s are continued using the regular<br />

furrow/rill or border strip system.<br />

IP 2.01.08 - Consider Changing the Irrigation System Type<br />

Objective<br />

Ensure that an appropriate <strong>irrigation</strong> system type, enabling sufficiently good application<br />

efficiency, has been chosen for the site.<br />

Description<br />

An <strong>irrigation</strong> system is only as good as the <strong>management</strong> of that system. However, some<br />

system types are more adapted <strong>to</strong> a particular situation than others. It may be that site<br />

conditions will prevent good <strong>irrigation</strong> performance with one <strong>irrigation</strong> system type.<br />

For example, it may be difficult <strong>to</strong> irrigate efficiently with furrows on a steep, rocky soil.<br />

Or, excessive wind conditions will place a limit on potential efficiency with sprinkle<br />

systems. In such cases consideration should be given <strong>to</strong> changing the <strong>irrigation</strong> system<br />

type. The final decision should be based on a complete economic analysis.<br />

It can be a difficult and expensive decision <strong>to</strong> change system types. The current <strong>irrigation</strong><br />

system operation should be evaluated first <strong>to</strong> see if there are changes that could be made <strong>to</strong><br />

improve performance (IP 2.01.03). If performance is poor, even with the best <strong>management</strong><br />

possible, other systems should be evaluated for adaptability.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!