14.07.2013 Views

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

Em4885 irrigation management practices to protect ground water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 CHAPTER<br />

Note that the opportunity times at the <strong>to</strong>p of a furrow and the bot<strong>to</strong>m of a furrow will<br />

never be the same since it takes time for the <strong>water</strong> <strong>to</strong> travel down the furrow. However,<br />

infiltration rates decrease with time during an <strong>irrigation</strong>. Thus, if the opportunity times are<br />

equalized <strong>to</strong> some degree, the difference in <strong>to</strong>tal infiltration between the <strong>to</strong>p and the<br />

bot<strong>to</strong>m of a furrow will be acceptably small. And, as the recommended advance ratios<br />

above indicate, the difference in opportunity times from <strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m of a furrow can be<br />

larger with a heavier soil than they are in a coarse soil for acceptable uniformity.<br />

Common <strong>practices</strong> <strong>to</strong> improve down-row uniformity include increasing furrow flow rates,<br />

cutting the length of furrows, and using surge-flow techniques. All of these are aimed at<br />

reducing the difference in opportunity times between the <strong>to</strong>p of the furrow and the bot<strong>to</strong>m.<br />

Achieving good down-row uniformity involves the potential for significant amounts of<br />

surface runoff. Assuming that the grower does not want <strong>to</strong> lose this runoff, it can be<br />

controlled by using cutback flows (IP 2.02.10), a runoff reuse system (2.02.11), surge-flow<br />

techniques (IP 2.02.03), or some combination.<br />

Cross-row uniformity<br />

Cross-row uniformity refers <strong>to</strong> the difference in infiltration from furrow <strong>to</strong> furrow.<br />

Differences in overall infiltration can occur due <strong>to</strong> differences in infiltration rates or<br />

differences in opportunity time.<br />

Usually, trac<strong>to</strong>r tires do not run in every row of a furrow irrigated field. Thus, some<br />

furrows are compacted by the trac<strong>to</strong>r tires and some are not and there will be different<br />

infiltration rates in those furrows. Additionally, as a trac<strong>to</strong>r makes a turn in a field, a<br />

“guess row” is created that may have a different infiltration rate from either the compacted<br />

or the uncompacted rows. A schematic diagram showing the effects of poor cross-row<br />

uniformity due <strong>to</strong> compaction from tire trac<strong>to</strong>rs is seen in Figure 4-11.<br />

Head of Field<br />

Bot<strong>to</strong>m of Field<br />

FIGURE 4-11. Schematic diagram showing effects of poor cross-row uniformity due<br />

<strong>to</strong> compaction from trac<strong>to</strong>r tires<br />

38<br />

Area of generally lower<br />

<strong>water</strong> infiltration<br />

direction of<br />

<strong>water</strong> flow

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!