14.07.2013 Views

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Framework for Economic Development, State Sponsored Violence, and Migration:<br />

Guatemala 1950-1995<br />

The purpose of this case study is to determine whether the framework developed out of<br />

the migration literature explains and correctly predicts the events and forces which influence<br />

migration patterns in Guatemala (1950-1995). The framework developed out of the migration<br />

literature is depicted in figure 6.1 and is described below in table 6.1.<br />

Table 6.1<br />

Framework Framework Begins with<br />

the observation of:<br />

Victor<br />

(2010)<br />

Economic Development:<br />

movement from subsistence<br />

agriculture to export<br />

agriculture and/or the<br />

introduction of neoliberal<br />

economic policies<br />

Leading to: Leading to: Leading to:<br />

Structural<br />

changes to<br />

economy, society<br />

Conflict between<br />

state and<br />

populace, conflict<br />

is predominantly<br />

state sponsored<br />

violence<br />

Increases to<br />

intra and<br />

interstate<br />

migration<br />

The framework provides the initiating factor, economic development, which results in<br />

structural changes to the economy and the society, these structural changes often necessitate and<br />

result in a violent form of enforcement which is carried out by the state, the increase in violence<br />

leads to increases in migration. 23<br />

The framework provides the end point this case study is<br />

attempting to explain, changes in intrastate and interstate migration within Guatemala.<br />

Economic Development and Structural Changes<br />

The explanation of economic development and structural change will be organized<br />

loosely by the policies adopted during specific presidential administrations. The successive<br />

presidential terms at times demonstrate an overlap of preferred economic policies in the years<br />

1950 to 1995, and at other times remain distinct policies. The Arbenz administration (1950-1954)<br />

23 Each of the frameworks utilized by this study, to build the framework being applied, used a slightly<br />

different term to describe essentially the same economic phenomena (i.e. agricultural development,<br />

economic modernization, capital penetration, neoliberal economic policies); this case study makes use of<br />

the term economic development to denote the first step listed in each of the frameworks.<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!