14.07.2013 Views

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The final findings of the CEH report in 1999 echoed that of the REMHI report, 200,000<br />

people died in the conflict, and ultimately at least 93% of the killings were attributed to the state,<br />

3% were attributed to the guerrillas, and 4% were undetermined. The state was responsible for<br />

626 separate massacres, the UNRG for 32. The CEH interviewed witnesses concerning over<br />

40,000 violations; their findings implicated not only the state and the guerrilla groups but also the<br />

United States, the CIA, the G-2, and the Presidential Military Guard (EMP). The CEH report<br />

highlighted the horrors of the political violence, especially the treatment of women and children<br />

throughout Guatemala. The CEH noted the frequent use of rape, torture, and the removal of<br />

fetuses from the womb before the women were killed. Children were frequently beaten to death,<br />

set on fire, had their limbs cut off, were impaled, or thrown into pits alive with the corpses of<br />

their parents thrown on top. The CEH report found that the state identified indigenous Mayas as<br />

an “internal enemy” to be “exterminated” justice for the victims of the state sponsored violence<br />

was not likely, the commission “was prohibited from specifically naming human rights violators<br />

under the peace accords agreed by the government and the URNG” (Central America Report,<br />

1999). Though there were technically exceptions to the 1997 Law of Reconciliation, nearly every<br />

individual was granted immunity for crimes committed during the 36 year conflict. The slight<br />

opening in the Laws of Reconciliation and the findings of the CEH led the Center for Human<br />

Rights Legal Action to decide to pursue genocide charges against General Montt. General<br />

Montt’s response was to issue the following statement in response to the CEH and the allegations<br />

of genocide, “I was never, ever informed of any acts of this nature [genocide]…I never ordered a<br />

massacre…I did not consciously do anything against the law” (Central America Report, 1999).<br />

The Guatemalan state dismissed the findings of the CEH as “redundant” and refused to comment<br />

on the document for several days, the leading newspapers in Guatemala responded similarly to<br />

the document. The United States offered a response similar to General Montt’s denial, regarding<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!