14.07.2013 Views

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and timber contained and extracted from the Petén region were much lower than expected, due in<br />

part to a world recession in the early 1970s (Calvert, 1985, 150). Moreover, a lack of arable land<br />

and necessary infrastructure kept any significant numbers of voluntary settlers out of the Petén<br />

region (Calvert, 1985, 150-151).<br />

In the first and second periods the efforts to modernize the economy and diversify exports<br />

had a positive or non-negative impact on Gross Domestic Product (GDP), GDP growth rates, per<br />

capita incomes, and total exports. The Guatemalan economy grew during the first and second<br />

periods; from 1950 to 1960 GDP had more than <strong>double</strong>d from US$447,000,000 to<br />

US$1,021,000,000. The growth rate for GDP averaged 3.8% for the entire decade. But, the<br />

largest increases in GDP growth rate occurred under Colonel Armas; between 1955 and 1956 the<br />

GDP growth rate increased from 2.5 to 9.1. Per capita income at the start of the decade was<br />

US$147 by 1960 it was US$257. Also, during the decade Guatemalan exports rose from 85<br />

million (Quetzals) to 131 million (Quetzals). 24<br />

24 At this time the Quetzal was pegged 1:1 with the U.S. dollar.<br />

135<br />

Unfortunately, one of the economic indicators that<br />

could best describe how the level of economic growth affected the entire Guatemalan population,<br />

the Gini Index, was not in use during the 1950s. Furthermore, per capita measurements and<br />

national aggregate data can provide an indication as to the quality of life, but are not<br />

measurements of the distribution of resources within a population. As a result, while the<br />

available economic indicators for the first and second periods are nearly all positive two<br />

important items must be considered, (1) the very low starting point of each of the economic<br />

indicators and (2) the distribution of resources within the Guatemalan population. The level of<br />

total external debt increased during the decade, from US$19 million to US$68 million. The level<br />

of Official Development Assistance (ODA) also significantly increased from US$156,000 to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!