Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf
Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf
Complete Thesis_double spaced abstract.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lifetime migrants are defined as “people whose place of birth differs from the place of residents<br />
at some later date” (Micklin, 1990, 164). Recent migrants are defined as people who’s “current<br />
place of residence differs from that five years earlier” (Micklin, 1990, 164). And intermediate<br />
migrants are defined as people who “show a difference between place of birth and place of<br />
residence five years preceding the census” (Micklin, 1990, 164). The categories in the census do<br />
not clearly show migration movements from year to year, or carefully track seasonal migration.<br />
Using census data from states within the region (United States, Mexico, Belize,<br />
Honduras, Canada, and Costa Rica) to analyze inter-state migratory patterns can also prove to be<br />
problematic. Mexico and the United States are the two largest recipients of Guatemalan migrants,<br />
yet in each of their national censuses they aggregated the data for all Central American migrants<br />
until the 1980s. After the 1980s when the data is disaggregated in the censuses there is still the<br />
underlying issue of significant undernumeration of undocumented Guatemalan migrants in states<br />
throughout the region.<br />
Border Control and Immigration Offices in Receiving States<br />
The benefit of data collected from border control and immigration agencies in receiving<br />
states is that the information is almost always reported on an annual basis. However there are<br />
several issues to consider when using this data: (1) border control and immigration agencies do<br />
not capture or process all migrants crossing the territorial boundaries into receiving states, (2)<br />
until recently, certain agencies, including the United States immigration and border control<br />
agencies aggregated their data for Central American migrants, (3) at times when apprehended,<br />
migrants will not state their true country of origin to immigration officers, instead offering a<br />
closer state as an alternative to be deported, and (4) not all states consistently publish or report<br />
statistics on the number of apprehensions at border crossing areas. The product of the<br />
aforementioned issues is that migration data is often unavailable or unreliable from the various<br />
45