The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 2 - AccountAbility
The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 2 - AccountAbility
The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 2 - AccountAbility
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BAT's Reporting on <strong>Stakeholder</strong> Dialogues and Assurance by Bureau Veritas<br />
17 See also the section ‘Principles and Standards for <strong>Stakeholder</strong> <strong>Engagement</strong>’ in the introduction.<br />
STAGE 5<br />
In the material issues section of British American Tobacco plc’s Social Report 2004/2005, BAT reports on six topics identifi ed as<br />
being of material interest to the Group and its stakeholders, which emerged following stakeholder dialogue internationally over three<br />
reporting cycles. <strong>The</strong>se topics are: Marketing and youth smoking prevention; Health risks and product information; Harm reduction;<br />
Public place smoking; BAT’s primary supply chain; Excise and tackling illicit trade. <strong>The</strong> stakeholder dialogue with UK companies in<br />
2004/2005’s social reporting cycle therefore focused on these six topics.<br />
For each topic in this section, BAT includes in the report:<br />
an independently compiled dialogue report and stakeholders’ comments;<br />
all commitments made in the previous year and a report on progress.<br />
Furthermore, each topic is prefaced by an independent commentary from the UK’s Institute of Business Ethics.<br />
In addition to these ‘soft’ assurance mechanisms, BAT plc’s Social Report 2004/2005 report also underwent a thorough external<br />
assurance process which is carried out by Bureau Veritas using the AA1000 Assurance Standard. Bureau Veritas employs different<br />
symbols for different levels of assurance; the symbols mark different elements of the reports. <strong>The</strong> highest level of assurance<br />
‘awarded’ meant that Bureau Veritas warranted that the information presented was supported by underlying evidence, the activities<br />
had been observed by the assuror, and the activities described were aligned to the requirements of the AA1000. Audit techniques<br />
employed by Bureau Veritas included:<br />
Face-to-face and telephone interviews with relevant British American Tobacco personnel, both at its headquarters in the UK and at<br />
local company level;<br />
Reviewing of relevant systems and processes in place where available;<br />
Detailed reviews of documentary evidence held at the British American Tobacco headquarters in London in relation to the<br />
activity conducted there and of information relating to British American Tobacco’s responses to the points raised in dialogue;<br />
Discussions with external parties to corroborate information where appropriate;<br />
Attendeding all stakeholder dialogue sessions held by British American Tobacco in London; Kenya and Brussels;<br />
Attended four consumer dialogue sessions held by British American Tobacco in the UK<br />
Reviewing reports compiled by the independent facilitators from each UK-based and international dialogue.<br />
Specifi cally when focusing on the use of a corporate responsibility report in<br />
relation to stakeholder engagement, the principles of materiality, completeness<br />
and responsiveness can be used to assess the quality of the report. Below is a<br />
checklist that you can use to check whether your report is aligned with these<br />
principles 17 .<br />
THE PRACTITIONER'S HANDBOOK ON STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT | 127