15.07.2013 Views

The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 2 - AccountAbility

The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 2 - AccountAbility

The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 2 - AccountAbility

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BAT's Reporting on <strong>Stakeholder</strong> Dialogues and Assurance by Bureau Veritas<br />

17 See also the section ‘Principles and Standards for <strong>Stakeholder</strong> <strong>Engagement</strong>’ in the introduction.<br />

STAGE 5<br />

In the material issues section of British American Tobacco plc’s Social Report 2004/2005, BAT reports on six topics identifi ed as<br />

being of material interest to the Group and its stakeholders, which emerged following stakeholder dialogue internationally over three<br />

reporting cycles. <strong>The</strong>se topics are: Marketing and youth smoking prevention; Health risks and product information; Harm reduction;<br />

Public place smoking; BAT’s primary supply chain; Excise and tackling illicit trade. <strong>The</strong> stakeholder dialogue with UK companies in<br />

2004/2005’s social reporting cycle therefore focused on these six topics.<br />

For each topic in this section, BAT includes in the report:<br />

an independently compiled dialogue report and stakeholders’ comments;<br />

all commitments made in the previous year and a report on progress.<br />

Furthermore, each topic is prefaced by an independent commentary from the UK’s Institute of Business Ethics.<br />

In addition to these ‘soft’ assurance mechanisms, BAT plc’s Social Report 2004/2005 report also underwent a thorough external<br />

assurance process which is carried out by Bureau Veritas using the AA1000 Assurance Standard. Bureau Veritas employs different<br />

symbols for different levels of assurance; the symbols mark different elements of the reports. <strong>The</strong> highest level of assurance<br />

‘awarded’ meant that Bureau Veritas warranted that the information presented was supported by underlying evidence, the activities<br />

had been observed by the assuror, and the activities described were aligned to the requirements of the AA1000. Audit techniques<br />

employed by Bureau Veritas included:<br />

Face-to-face and telephone interviews with relevant British American Tobacco personnel, both at its headquarters in the UK and at<br />

local company level;<br />

Reviewing of relevant systems and processes in place where available;<br />

Detailed reviews of documentary evidence held at the British American Tobacco headquarters in London in relation to the<br />

activity conducted there and of information relating to British American Tobacco’s responses to the points raised in dialogue;<br />

Discussions with external parties to corroborate information where appropriate;<br />

Attendeding all stakeholder dialogue sessions held by British American Tobacco in London; Kenya and Brussels;<br />

Attended four consumer dialogue sessions held by British American Tobacco in the UK<br />

Reviewing reports compiled by the independent facilitators from each UK-based and international dialogue.<br />

Specifi cally when focusing on the use of a corporate responsibility report in<br />

relation to stakeholder engagement, the principles of materiality, completeness<br />

and responsiveness can be used to assess the quality of the report. Below is a<br />

checklist that you can use to check whether your report is aligned with these<br />

principles 17 .<br />

THE PRACTITIONER'S HANDBOOK ON STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT | 127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!