25.07.2013 Views

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

any statistically significant differences among elementary students’ views toward importance, necessity, learning<br />

environment of science and technology classes and teaching strategies of their science teachers in terms of the gender<br />

variable.<br />

Population and sampling<br />

The population of this study comprised sixth-grade students from 20 elementary schools in Elazig, Turkey. The<br />

stratified proportional random sampling procedure was used to select the schools. There are five education zones in<br />

the city. The schools were stratified on the basis of education zones and their socioeconomic conditions. Then four<br />

schools from each education zone were selected with three levels of socioeconomic status reported by the National<br />

Education Office. The sample consisted of 1,558 (925 male and 633 female) sixth-grade students selected randomly<br />

from those elementary schools. The simple random sampling procedure was used to select 318 students from each<br />

elementary school. A total of 1,590 students participated in the study. However, out of these 1,590 students, 1,582<br />

completed questionnaires. Of this total number, 24 were incomplete and were thus eliminated, leaving a sample of<br />

1,558 students. The gender composition of the respondents is 59.4 % male and 40.6% female.<br />

Data collection and analysis<br />

Data was generated from a questionnaire in which a five-point Likert scale was used. Students were asked to rate<br />

their opinions about the science and technology courses they were taking (Appendix A). The survey, administered in<br />

the classroom, included 20 items derived from the review of the relevant literature. In some classes the researcher<br />

administered the survey himself and in others, classroom teachers were trained to administer the survey. In all cases,<br />

the same procedures were followed. Students were reminded that their answers would remain anonymous, and they<br />

were asked to read the items carefully and answer honestly.<br />

The survey, with responses of strongly agree, agree, partly agree, disagree, and strongly disagree, was first piloted on<br />

4<strong>15</strong> students for the factor-analysis process. The pilot participants were similar to the target population in terms of<br />

background. Factor analysis was used to examine the correlation between the items of each subscale. Factor analysis<br />

revealed four subscales, namely: importance, necessity, learning environment, and teaching strategy.<br />

Table 1.Cronbach’s alpha reliability scores for each subscale<br />

Subscales Item No α<br />

Importance 1, 3, 7, 11, 18 0.94<br />

Necessity 2, 9, 10, 13, 14 0.94<br />

Learning environment 4,5, 12, <strong>15</strong>, 17 0.93<br />

Teaching strategy 6, 8, 16, 19, 20 0.94<br />

The internal reliability of the scale was calculated by using Cronbach’s alpha formula, the Spearman-Brown<br />

reliability coefficient, and Guttmann’s split-half technique. Cronbach’s alpha for the importance subscale (α = 0.94),<br />

necessity subscale (α = 0.94), learning-environment subscale (α = 0.93), teaching-strategy subscale (α = 0.94), and<br />

overall scale (α = 0.98) showed satisfactory reliability because a Cronbach’s alpha scale greater than 0.70 was<br />

considered acceptable for the internal reliability of the items associated with each proposed factor (Hair, Anderson,<br />

Tatham, & Black, 1995). For the whole sample, the Spearman-Brown reliability coefficient for unequal lengths was<br />

calculated to be 0.96, and Guttmann’s split-half technique revealed a reliability coefficient of 0.96. The Kaiser-<br />

MeyerOlkin measure of sampling adequacy of the scale was measured to be 0.97, and Bartlett’s test was calculated<br />

to be 37,063.668 (p < 0.05). According to the results obtained from the factor-analysis process, the scale was found<br />

to be valid and reliable. In a prior examination, when the distribution of the data was found to be non-normal, the<br />

non-parametric statistical technique Mann-Whitney U was used for testing gender differences. When the distribution<br />

of the data was found normal, the parametric statistical technique, the independent groups t-test, was used. Results<br />

with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!