25.07.2013 Views

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

approach to delivering instruction, both formal and non-formal educational institutions all around the world and also<br />

in Turkey have strikingly been engaged in DE. Although DE can be traced back fifty years in Turkey, it was first<br />

mentioned in a meeting in 1927 as a means to increase the number of literate people (Alkan, 1987, p. 91).<br />

Unfortunately, it was not applied in Turkey owing to the idea that education is not possible without a teacher and a<br />

real classroom atmosphere. It appeared again in the 1970s with a closer meaning of distance education today. In<br />

1982, the Council of Higher Education was established to plan, organise, administer, supervise and regulate all<br />

higher education institutions in the country. Belatedly, within the same year, the Open Education Faculty (OEF) was<br />

founded in Anadolu University, as it had sufficient infrastructure. Today, the OEF offers a great variety of<br />

undergraduate degree programs to more than 750,000 Turkish students across Turkey, Cyprus and Europe (Demiray,<br />

1998).<br />

The Distance English Language Teaching (DELT) undergraduate program was established in 2000 with Basic<br />

Education Law numbered 2547 to meet the great need for EFL teachers, especially in primary and secondary<br />

schools. This was because English courses were integrated into their curricula in 2000. The DELT undergraduate<br />

program lasts for four years and during the first two years, students are provided partially face-to-face instruction for<br />

some basic courses such as contextual grammar, oral communication skills, advanced reading and writing, listening<br />

and pronunciation and then they have distance education for the last two years. As Bates & Bates (2000) state, DE<br />

programs worldwide use a range of technologies that include two-way interactive and one-way non-interactive<br />

delivery of courses. Instruction in the distance higher education system in Turkey is based on textbooks, television,<br />

CD-ROMs and radio broadcasts, which are, in general, one-way non-interactive delivery methods.<br />

The aforementioned teacher training degree program offers three courses with respect to ICT implementation. Two<br />

of them, Computer I and Computer II, aim to improve teacher candidates’ computer competency. The other,<br />

Instructional <strong>Technology</strong> and Material Design, aims to teach them how to use ICT pedagogically in the language<br />

teaching and learning processes. Nevertheless, the problem is that these courses are offered at distance through the<br />

use of mostly printed materials. Thus, prospective EFL teachers do not have the opportunity to experience ICT which<br />

is an inescapable component of powerful language learning and teaching. With this study, we aim to emphasize that<br />

prospective EFL teachers at OEF need in-class experience with ICT to be convinced of its usefulness and educational<br />

value.<br />

Methodology<br />

Sample characteristics<br />

The study was conducted with the participation of 85 prospective EFL teachers in distance higher education in<br />

Turkey. The participants were in the final year of a 4-year program leading to a bachelor’s degree in Teaching<br />

English as a Foreign Language. When the participants had distance instruction during the 4th year of their education,<br />

they were living in different regions of the country. Each participant was assigned a number during the data analysis<br />

procedure because of ethical considerations and they were reminded that this research would not be used for any<br />

assessment purposes and that personal details would be kept confidential. The demographic properties of the<br />

participants are presented in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Demographic properties of the participants<br />

Frequency Percentage (%)<br />

Gender Male 23 27<br />

Female 62 73<br />

Age 20-22 17 20<br />

23-24 52 61<br />

25-above 16 19<br />

Computer Yes 83 98<br />

Literate No 2 2<br />

TOTAL 85 100<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!