25.07.2013 Views

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kahle, J. B. (1983). The disadvantaged majority: Science education for women. Association for the Education of Teachers in<br />

Science, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242 561).<br />

Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20,<br />

131–140.<br />

Kahle, J.B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science<br />

teaching (pp.542–557). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.<br />

Kemp, R. L. (2005). The impact of gender-specific and mixed-gender cooperative groups on female gifted students using<br />

computer-assisted, problem-based learning. Action Research Exchange, 4(1). Retrieved November 12, 2010, from<br />

http://teach.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no1/pdf/KempRArticle.pdf<br />

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II affective domain.<br />

New York: David McKay Company, Inc.<br />

Kurth, K. (1987). Factors which influence a female’s decision to remain in science (Exit Project S 591). Indiana University, South<br />

Bend, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288 739).<br />

Labudde, P., Herzog, W., Neuenschwander, M. P., Violi, E., & Gerber, C. (2000). Girls and physics: Teaching and learning<br />

strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 143–<strong>15</strong>7.<br />

Lawrenz, F. (1987). Gender effects for student perception of the classroom psychosocial environment. Journal of Research in<br />

Science Teaching, 24(8), 689–697.<br />

Leder, G. C. (1989). Mathematics learning and socialisation processes. In L. Burton (Ed.), Girls into maths can go, (pp. 77–89).<br />

London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.<br />

Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (1996). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and<br />

course emphasis. Science Education, 80(6), 613–650.<br />

Linn, M., & Hyde, J. (1989). Gender mathematics and science. <strong>Educational</strong> Researcher, 18(8), 17–27.<br />

Lundeberg, M., Fox, P. & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confidant but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence<br />

judgements. Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology, 86, 114–121.<br />

Lyons, J. B. (2001). Do school facilities really affect a child’s education? Retrieved December <strong>15</strong>, 2006, from<br />

http://www.cefpi.org/pdf/issue14.pdf<br />

Massachusetts Department of Education (2006). Massachusetts Science and <strong>Technology</strong>/Engineering Curriculum Framework.<br />

Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf<br />

Meece, J. L., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology, 85(4),<br />

582–590.<br />

Meyer, K. (1998). Reflections on being female in school science: Toward a praxis of teaching science. Journal of Research in<br />

Science Teaching, 35(4), 463–471.<br />

Meyer, M., & Koehler, M. S. (1990). Internal influences on gender differences in mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. Leder (Eds.),<br />

Mathematics and gender (pp. 60–95). New York: Teachers College Press.<br />

Norman, C. (1988). Math education: A mixed picture. Science, 241(4864), 408–409.<br />

Ogunjuyigbe, P. O., Ojofeitimi, E. O., & Akinlo, A. (2006). Science education in Nigeria: An examination of people’s perceptions<br />

about female participation in science, mathematics and technology. Journal of Science Education and <strong>Technology</strong>, <strong>15</strong>(3–4), 277–<br />

284.<br />

Otto, P. B. (1991). One science. One sex? School Science and Mathematics, 91(8), 367–372.<br />

Owens, L., & Straton, R. (1980). The development of a cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preference scale for<br />

students. British Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology, 50, 147–63.<br />

Panagiotopoulou, G., Christoulas, K., Papanckolaou, A., & Mandroukas, K. (2004). Classroom furniture dimensions and<br />

anthropometric measures in primary school. Applied Ergonomics, 35(2), 121–128.<br />

Piburn, M., & Baker, D. (1989). Sex differences in formal reasoning ability: Task and interviewer effects. Science Education, 73,<br />

101–113.<br />

Popham, W. (1994). <strong>Educational</strong> assessment's lurking lacuna: The measure of affect. Education and Urban Society, 26 (4), 404–<br />

416.<br />

Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chuda, J. (2007). Slovakian students’ attitudes toward biology. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics,<br />

Science & <strong>Technology</strong> Education, 3(4), 287–295.<br />

Raat, J. H., & de Vries, M. (1985). What do 13-year old students think about technology? The conception of and the attitude<br />

towards technology of 13-year old girls and boys. Eindhoven University of <strong>Technology</strong>, The Netherlands. (ERIC Document<br />

Reproduction Service No. ED 262–998).<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!