25.07.2013 Views

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results<br />

Detection rates<br />

As seen in Table 1, although all factorial interactions were significant at the .001 alpha level, most of the interactive<br />

2<br />

effect sizes were small (partial ’s < .10). The maximal effect size occurred in the main effects of the index<br />

2 (partial = .69). This implies the index factor contributed to the difference in detection rates the most. Therefore,<br />

we examined the difference in detection rates among indices. In Figure 1, the group-based indices seemed to perform<br />

better than the IRT-based indices. The detection rates of all group-based indices, except for the NCI, were over .90.<br />

The detection rates of all the IRT-based indices, except for the ECI2z and the INFITz were over .50 but lower than<br />

.70. Note that with a detection rate of .92, the BW performed as well as Wc&Bs, SCI, and MCI did.<br />

According to the data in Table 1, the condition factors showed interactive effects on detection rates, but their effects<br />

were very small (all were less than .02, except for the effects of the index factor on the AT and AS factors, both<br />

partial 2<br />

= .10). Thus, it was appropriate to investigate the stability of indices in the AT and AS conditions<br />

individually and disregard the other interactive effects between these factors.<br />

Table 1. Five-way analysis of variance of detection rates (N = 81,000)<br />

Sources Type III SS df MS F Partial 2<br />

<br />

Index (IN) 97517.79 9 10835.31 195934.65*** .69<br />

Content Category (CC) 22.53 1 22.53 407.48*** .00<br />

Aberrance Type (AT) 3949.63 2 1974.81 35710.52*** .08<br />

Aberrance Severity (AS) 3859.39 2 1929.70 34894.67*** .08<br />

Aberrance Person (AP) 418.88 2 209.44 3787.27*** .01<br />

IN × CC 685.96 9 76.22 1378.25*** .02<br />

IN × AT 4928.06 18 273.78 4950.78*** .10<br />

IN × AS 4822.23 18 267.90 4844.46*** .10<br />

IN × AP 393.93 18 21.89 395.75*** .01<br />

CC × AT 278.80 2 139.40 2520.80*** .01<br />

CC × AS 1002.87 2 501.43 9067.42*** .02<br />

CC × AP <strong>15</strong>.09 2 7.54 136.42*** .00<br />

AT × AS 54.64 4 13.66 247.02*** .00<br />

AT × AP <strong>15</strong>.89 4 3.97 71.85*** .00<br />

AS × AP 24.91 4 6.23 112.60*** .00<br />

IN × CC × AT 550.84 18 30.60 553.38*** .01<br />

IN × CC × AS 614.83 18 34.16 617.66*** .01<br />

IN × CC × AP 119.45 18 6.64 120.00*** .00<br />

IN × AT × AS 305.26 36 8.48 <strong>15</strong>3.33*** .01<br />

IN × AT × AP 43.17 36 1.20 21.68*** .00<br />

IN × AS × AP 125.10 36 3.47 62.84*** .00<br />

CC × AT × AS 34.02 4 8.51 <strong>15</strong>3.80*** .00<br />

CC × AT × AP 6.37 4 1.59 28.80*** .00<br />

CC × AS × AP 23.01 4 5.75 104.02*** .00<br />

AT × AS × AP 20.70 8 2.59 46.80*** .00<br />

IN × CC × AT × AS 139.21 36 3.87 69.93*** .00<br />

IN × CC × AT × AP 43.48 36 1.21 21.84*** .00<br />

IN × CC × AS × AP 39.31 36 1.09 19.74*** .00<br />

IN × AS × AT × AP 53.39 72 0.74 13.41*** .00<br />

CC × AS × AT × AP 3.50 8 0.44 7.92*** .00<br />

IN × CC × AS × AT × AP 22.32 72 0.31 5.61*** .00<br />

Error 44763.65 809460 0.06<br />

Total 467477.18 810000<br />

***p < .001<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!