25.07.2013 Views

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

January 2012 Volume 15 Number 1 - Educational Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lee, J. (<strong>2012</strong>). Patterns of Interaction and Participation in a Large Online Course: Strategies for Fostering Sustainable Discussion.<br />

<strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> & Society, <strong>15</strong> (1), 260–272.<br />

Patterns of Interaction and Participation in a Large Online Course: Strategies<br />

for Fostering Sustainable Discussion<br />

Jiyeon Lee<br />

Myongji University, Bangmok College of Basic Studies, Republic of Korea//jiyeonlee@mju.ac.kr<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This case study investigated patterns of interaction and participation in a large online course. 88 Korean<br />

undergraduates participated in online fora during 2 weeks. It was found that there was a comparatively high<br />

portion of metacognitive interaction and higher phase of knowledge construction. However, it was found that<br />

students posted required number of messages at once around due date and selectively responded to peers’<br />

initiations without turn-taking. There were few responses despite many readings of peers’ postings to meet the<br />

required number and type of posting. The results showed that the discussion question and evaluation criteria<br />

influenced patterns of interaction and participation, and the phase of knowledge construction. Online<br />

instructional strategies were suggested for successful online discussion, especially to achieve sustainable<br />

discussion.<br />

Keywords<br />

Online interaction, Asynchronous fora, Knowledge construction<br />

Introduction<br />

The use of online courses and web-based communication has been growing exponentially with the expansion of<br />

online technology in colleges and universities. According to the results of a survey administered by the National<br />

Center for <strong>Educational</strong> Statistics (NCES), 56 percent of all degree-granting higher education institutions offered<br />

distance education courses in 2000-2001. 12 percent of all institutions showed that they planned to offer a distance<br />

education course in next 3 years (Waits & Lewis, 2003). The results from the most recent survey supported by Alfred<br />

P. Sloan Foundation confirmed fast growth of online learning in higher education. Over 4.6 million students were<br />

taking at least one online course during the fall 2008 term and more than one in four higher education students now<br />

take at least one online course based on the results (Allen & Seaman, 2010). Accordingly, fora have been considered<br />

one of the important components of online course (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2001; Marra, Moore, & Klimczak,<br />

2004) with its widespread use.<br />

Online fora characterized by asynchronous, text-based, and many-to-many communication have provided learners<br />

with flexible time and place independent learning, and facilitate a learning community with higher level of thinking<br />

with much learner-learner interaction (Bodzin & Park, 2000; Moore & Mara, 2005; Tutty & Klein, 2008). Learners<br />

have opportunities to share their own experience with peers in a shared electronic place which contributes to forming<br />

a good relationship (Chai & Tan, 2009). Text-based asynchronous interaction facilitates critical reflection by<br />

threaded discussion and enough time to reflect, think, and search for information (De Wever, Schellens, Valcke, &<br />

Van Keer, 2006; Pena-Shaff & Nicholls, 2004). All contents of online interaction are permanently stored and thus it<br />

helps students reflect on the learning process (Li, 2004). Suitable scaffolding and easily following the flow of<br />

discussion in online forums result in collaborative learning (Kanuka & Anderson, 1998; Veerman & Veldhuis-<br />

Diermanse, 2001). Sharing experiences, negotiating the meaning, and exchanging of resources and perspectives<br />

contribute to facilitating collective knowledge construction (Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson, 1997; Kanuka &<br />

Anderson, 1998; Moore & Marra, 2005). Students practice debate skills and gain deeper understanding by interaction<br />

with peers as a result (Reiser & Dempsey, 2002).<br />

Despite the educational potential of using asynchronous threaded discussion, studies still found that students spent<br />

too much time presenting their ideas to develop discussion (Hathorn & Ingram, 2002). They often produced<br />

discussions that lacked relevance, and participated less in a discussion (Islas, 2004). Students sometimes did not read<br />

peers’ postings and posted only to meet the required numbers (Bodzin & Park, 2000). Students often simply posted<br />

answers to the questions and relied heavily on the instructor’s feedback (Chai & Khine, 2006).<br />

As a result, online fora could not unconditionally guarantee educational potentials for the instructor. Learners’ ways<br />

of communication in online fora did not simply transfer from face-to-face to online environments, thus it is necessary<br />

to develop appropriate e-pedagogies (Li, 2008-2009). Tutty and Klein (2008), for example, suggested that face-toface<br />

collaboration might be better suited for learning regarding well-defined facts and procedures. Virtual<br />

ISSN 1436-4522 (online) and 1176-3647 (print). © International Forum of <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> & Society (IFETS). The authors and the forum jointly retain<br />

the copyright of the articles. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that<br />

copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work<br />

owned by others than IFETS must be honoured. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists,<br />

requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from the editors at kinshuk@ieee.org.<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!