28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

122 The <strong>New</strong> <strong>Imperialists</strong><br />

exports picked up sharply. Nearly one-third <strong>of</strong> demand for cloth in<br />

Bengal and Bihar was met by British imports. 54 The era <strong>of</strong> free trade was<br />

one in which Britain’s powerful export economy dominated not only the<br />

world economy but those <strong>of</strong> its colonies as well:<br />

Between 1885 and 1913 India took two-fifths <strong>of</strong> Britain’s total<br />

exports <strong>of</strong> cotton goods, based on low customs duties which<br />

worked to Britain’s advantage. India’s share <strong>of</strong> Britain’s imports fell<br />

to about 10 percent by 1900 and its share <strong>of</strong> India’s total exports<br />

fell from one-third in 1890 to one-quarter twenty years later, less<br />

than either Europe or Asia. 55<br />

As Davis summarizes: “The looms <strong>of</strong> India and China were defeated not<br />

so much by market competition as they were forcibly dismantled by war,<br />

invasion, opium and a Lancashire-imposed system <strong>of</strong> one-way tariffs . . .<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> force to configure a ‘liberal’ world economy is what Pax<br />

Britannica was really about.” 56<br />

Famine and Free Trade<br />

But it was not for lack <strong>of</strong> ideological commitment that India failed to<br />

overcome its essentially pre-capitalist dynamic in the second half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nineteenth century. Colonial <strong>of</strong>ficials both at home and in the colonies<br />

saw their “civilizing mission” as imparting the benefits <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

“improvement” and Christian piety. The “gentlemanly capitalism” 57 that<br />

dominated in the colonial administration sought to link the socialproperty<br />

relations which lay at the heart <strong>of</strong> England’s seventeenth- and<br />

eighteenth-century agrarian capitalist revolution with the newer forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> financial and service capital that came to prominence in the later<br />

nineteenth century. These <strong>of</strong>ficials had read their Locke on property,<br />

enclosure, and “improvement.” They were also avid proponents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

latest principles <strong>of</strong> political economy espoused by Malthus, Bentham,<br />

and Mill. It was the liberal empire – so vaunted by Ferguson – which<br />

encouraged not just chronic economic underdevelopment, but which<br />

bears responsibility for the deaths <strong>of</strong> millions due to starvation during<br />

the two great waves <strong>of</strong> famine which swept India in 1876–79 and<br />

1896–1900.<br />

Between 5.5 and 12 million died in the famine <strong>of</strong> 1876–79 and<br />

mortality rates were highest in areas best served by railways. As Mike

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!