New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MIRRLEES: American S<strong>of</strong>t Power 215<br />
<strong>of</strong> America’s post-9/11 national security crisis and the war on global<br />
terrorism to rationalize American s<strong>of</strong>t power.<br />
Through his rationalization <strong>of</strong> American s<strong>of</strong>t power (as military<br />
information operations), Armistead contradicts America’s purported<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> a free, pluralistic, and democratic commercial media system.<br />
The ideal <strong>of</strong> a free-market media system that is not subject to state<br />
regulation, under partisan political control, or susceptible to propagandistic<br />
intervention by the military is laid to waste with Armistead’s<br />
recommendations. Dismissing the erosion <strong>of</strong> American civil liberties and<br />
advocating the military recruitment <strong>of</strong> the commercial media for<br />
government propaganda purposes, Armistead worries:<br />
The openness and freedom that make life in America so precious<br />
to its citizens also make it vulnerable to informational warfare by<br />
its adversaries. . . . The very laws that protect our civil liberties<br />
make it possible for our adversaries to operate in relative obscurity,<br />
right under our noses. . . . [T]here is now serious debate about<br />
curbing civil liberties in exchange for security. . . . Though, to an<br />
extent, this sense <strong>of</strong> anxiety has settled down with the American<br />
populace, still the nation has obviously forgotten about the necessity<br />
for cooperation between military and media during national<br />
emergencies, a practice that was so common during World War II.<br />
It can be easy to blame the news media’s lack <strong>of</strong> discretion today,<br />
and we as a nation have to do better. 71<br />
“Doing better” appears to be an acceptance <strong>of</strong> military and state<br />
propaganda as a necessary function <strong>of</strong> U.S. national security. Forget<br />
about the free-market ideology espoused by the proponents <strong>of</strong> the U.S.<br />
commercial media system, which used the threat <strong>of</strong> big government<br />
to demonize all public struggles for media reform and regulation. “In<br />
contemporary information operations,” argues Armistead, “the full<br />
integration across government agencies with private industry must<br />
occur.” 72 This “means horizontal as well as vertical integration and<br />
cooperation, and includes not only United States Government Agencies<br />
and departments, but also non-government units and private industry as<br />
well”; 73 information operations “must also be led from the top-down,<br />
with full White House and National Security Council leadership to<br />
ensure full inter-agency participation.” 74<br />
Armistead’s desire to temper the supposed freedom <strong>of</strong> the American