28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MIRRLEES: American S<strong>of</strong>t Power 215<br />

<strong>of</strong> America’s post-9/11 national security crisis and the war on global<br />

terrorism to rationalize American s<strong>of</strong>t power.<br />

Through his rationalization <strong>of</strong> American s<strong>of</strong>t power (as military<br />

information operations), Armistead contradicts America’s purported<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> a free, pluralistic, and democratic commercial media system.<br />

The ideal <strong>of</strong> a free-market media system that is not subject to state<br />

regulation, under partisan political control, or susceptible to propagandistic<br />

intervention by the military is laid to waste with Armistead’s<br />

recommendations. Dismissing the erosion <strong>of</strong> American civil liberties and<br />

advocating the military recruitment <strong>of</strong> the commercial media for<br />

government propaganda purposes, Armistead worries:<br />

The openness and freedom that make life in America so precious<br />

to its citizens also make it vulnerable to informational warfare by<br />

its adversaries. . . . The very laws that protect our civil liberties<br />

make it possible for our adversaries to operate in relative obscurity,<br />

right under our noses. . . . [T]here is now serious debate about<br />

curbing civil liberties in exchange for security. . . . Though, to an<br />

extent, this sense <strong>of</strong> anxiety has settled down with the American<br />

populace, still the nation has obviously forgotten about the necessity<br />

for cooperation between military and media during national<br />

emergencies, a practice that was so common during World War II.<br />

It can be easy to blame the news media’s lack <strong>of</strong> discretion today,<br />

and we as a nation have to do better. 71<br />

“Doing better” appears to be an acceptance <strong>of</strong> military and state<br />

propaganda as a necessary function <strong>of</strong> U.S. national security. Forget<br />

about the free-market ideology espoused by the proponents <strong>of</strong> the U.S.<br />

commercial media system, which used the threat <strong>of</strong> big government<br />

to demonize all public struggles for media reform and regulation. “In<br />

contemporary information operations,” argues Armistead, “the full<br />

integration across government agencies with private industry must<br />

occur.” 72 This “means horizontal as well as vertical integration and<br />

cooperation, and includes not only United States Government Agencies<br />

and departments, but also non-government units and private industry as<br />

well”; 73 information operations “must also be led from the top-down,<br />

with full White House and National Security Council leadership to<br />

ensure full inter-agency participation.” 74<br />

Armistead’s desire to temper the supposed freedom <strong>of</strong> the American

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!