New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MIRRLEES: American S<strong>of</strong>t Power 211<br />
multicultural society help him to distinguish his slogan <strong>of</strong> American s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
power from the critical discourse <strong>of</strong> U.S. cultural imperialism. Through<br />
the discourse <strong>of</strong> American s<strong>of</strong>t power, Nye rationalizes America’s global<br />
superpower status and the U.S. state’s global promotion and extension <strong>of</strong><br />
American cultural values while attempting to distinguish his politics<br />
and foreign policy prescriptions from the Bush administration’s neoconservatives.<br />
By the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Nye’s text, the line between Nye and<br />
neocons begins to blur:<br />
We have been more successful in the domain <strong>of</strong> hard power, where<br />
we have invested more, trained more, and have a clearer idea <strong>of</strong><br />
what we are doing. We have been less successful in the areas <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
power, where our public diplomacy has been woefully inadequate<br />
and our neglect <strong>of</strong> allies and institutions has created a sense <strong>of</strong><br />
illegitimacy that has squandered our attractiveness. . . . America’s<br />
success will depend upon our developing a better balance <strong>of</strong> hard<br />
and s<strong>of</strong>t power in our foreign policy. 48<br />
This statement reveals the realpolitik that, throughout Nye’s text, is<br />
diluted by multilateralist and diplomatic posturing. Nye, like so many<br />
neoliberal Democrats who distinguish their foreign policy tactics and<br />
goals from the explicit power projections <strong>of</strong> the neoconservatives with<br />
glossy diplomatic phrases such as “s<strong>of</strong>t power” and “American leadership,”<br />
does not do a good job <strong>of</strong> it at the end <strong>of</strong> his text. Nye supports<br />
America’s global rule and issues a way to strengthen the imperial state’s<br />
hegemonic goal <strong>of</strong> balancing strategies <strong>of</strong> coercion with strategies <strong>of</strong><br />
ideological suasion (or cultural imperialism).<br />
LEIGH ARMISTEAD: AMERICAN SOFT POWER AS AMERICAN<br />
INFORMATION OPERATIONS<br />
Imperial powers have used propaganda (the deliberate effort to persuade<br />
people to think and behave in a specific way) and a class <strong>of</strong> propagandists<br />
(people that conduct propaganda campaigns) to achieve strategic goals. 49<br />
Leigh Armistead was a former instructor <strong>of</strong> information warfare at the<br />
Joint Forces Staff College. He thus worked as a military propagandist for<br />
the U.S. empire. Currently, Armistead is a doctoral candidate at Edith<br />
Cowan University, Perth, Australia, writing a dissertation on U.S. information<br />
operations as American s<strong>of</strong>t power. This is also the subject <strong>of</strong> an