28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MIRRLEES: American S<strong>of</strong>t Power 211<br />

multicultural society help him to distinguish his slogan <strong>of</strong> American s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

power from the critical discourse <strong>of</strong> U.S. cultural imperialism. Through<br />

the discourse <strong>of</strong> American s<strong>of</strong>t power, Nye rationalizes America’s global<br />

superpower status and the U.S. state’s global promotion and extension <strong>of</strong><br />

American cultural values while attempting to distinguish his politics<br />

and foreign policy prescriptions from the Bush administration’s neoconservatives.<br />

By the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Nye’s text, the line between Nye and<br />

neocons begins to blur:<br />

We have been more successful in the domain <strong>of</strong> hard power, where<br />

we have invested more, trained more, and have a clearer idea <strong>of</strong><br />

what we are doing. We have been less successful in the areas <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

power, where our public diplomacy has been woefully inadequate<br />

and our neglect <strong>of</strong> allies and institutions has created a sense <strong>of</strong><br />

illegitimacy that has squandered our attractiveness. . . . America’s<br />

success will depend upon our developing a better balance <strong>of</strong> hard<br />

and s<strong>of</strong>t power in our foreign policy. 48<br />

This statement reveals the realpolitik that, throughout Nye’s text, is<br />

diluted by multilateralist and diplomatic posturing. Nye, like so many<br />

neoliberal Democrats who distinguish their foreign policy tactics and<br />

goals from the explicit power projections <strong>of</strong> the neoconservatives with<br />

glossy diplomatic phrases such as “s<strong>of</strong>t power” and “American leadership,”<br />

does not do a good job <strong>of</strong> it at the end <strong>of</strong> his text. Nye supports<br />

America’s global rule and issues a way to strengthen the imperial state’s<br />

hegemonic goal <strong>of</strong> balancing strategies <strong>of</strong> coercion with strategies <strong>of</strong><br />

ideological suasion (or cultural imperialism).<br />

LEIGH ARMISTEAD: AMERICAN SOFT POWER AS AMERICAN<br />

INFORMATION OPERATIONS<br />

Imperial powers have used propaganda (the deliberate effort to persuade<br />

people to think and behave in a specific way) and a class <strong>of</strong> propagandists<br />

(people that conduct propaganda campaigns) to achieve strategic goals. 49<br />

Leigh Armistead was a former instructor <strong>of</strong> information warfare at the<br />

Joint Forces Staff College. He thus worked as a military propagandist for<br />

the U.S. empire. Currently, Armistead is a doctoral candidate at Edith<br />

Cowan University, Perth, Australia, writing a dissertation on U.S. information<br />

operations as American s<strong>of</strong>t power. This is also the subject <strong>of</strong> an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!