28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MOJAB: Gender, Political Islam, and Imperialism 63<br />

anti-Semitism <strong>of</strong> the 1930s. Is it such a great leap <strong>of</strong> imagination to see<br />

mass round-ups and internment <strong>of</strong> Muslims in Western countries being<br />

undertaken in the name <strong>of</strong> the war on terror? We need knowledge,<br />

theoretical perspectives, and education aimed at overcoming imperialist<br />

racism. Cultural relativism, which was a powerful intellectual tool in<br />

the struggle against the eugenic strand <strong>of</strong> early twentieth-century<br />

racism, fails to contribute to the struggle today. I will argue that poststructuralism,<br />

too, is in a weak position to <strong>of</strong>fer alternatives.<br />

POLITICAL ISLAM AND THE PRODUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE<br />

With the foundation <strong>of</strong> Iran’s theocracy in 1979, Islam became a major<br />

site <strong>of</strong> political and intellectual conflict throughout the world. Ayatollah<br />

Khomeini created this theocracy in the wake <strong>of</strong> a very popular revolution,<br />

which overthrew the half-century rule <strong>of</strong> a Westernizing, “modernizing,”<br />

and secularist monarchy. He inspired Muslims throughout the world to<br />

fight not for Islam-friendly regimes, as he himself did until the early<br />

1970s, but for the creation <strong>of</strong> Islamic states. Some fifteen years later, the<br />

absolutist theocracy <strong>of</strong> the Taliban assumed power in neighboring<br />

Afghanistan in the wake <strong>of</strong> a highly destructive war between a pro-Soviet<br />

secular regime and Muslim groups supported by the U.S.A. and the<br />

region’s conservative states.<br />

When the Shah <strong>of</strong> Iran (labeled the “U.S. policeman” by American<br />

media) was on the verge <strong>of</strong> falling, Western powers, especially Washington,<br />

opted for Khomeini’s takeover <strong>of</strong> Iran in order to thwart a potential<br />

communist takeover in a strategically vital part <strong>of</strong> the world. There was<br />

nothing unusual in this policy, especially during the Cold War era. Back<br />

in the 1940s and early 1950s, the U.S.A. had advised the Shah to use Islam<br />

against growing social movements. In 1953, Washington planned and<br />

executed a coup d’état, which overthrew the democratically elected<br />

government <strong>of</strong> the nationalist leader, Dr. Mossadeq. Similar plans to<br />

support Islam against “communists” were on the agendas <strong>of</strong> other<br />

Middle Eastern countries (for example, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia).<br />

The imperialist interests <strong>of</strong> the United States and other Western powers<br />

acted as a brake on the struggle for the separation <strong>of</strong> state and religion,<br />

which had begun in the late nineteenth century. Western states consistently<br />

encouraged the suppression <strong>of</strong> civil liberties, nascent civil societies,<br />

and public spheres, which they considered to favor communism. 3 As a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!