28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HANIEH: Praising <strong>Empire</strong> 189<br />

the Third World is the result <strong>of</strong> predatory instincts, not from the Third<br />

World itself, however, but rather their colonial masters. His solution to<br />

the problem provides a clear example <strong>of</strong> how he sees the role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

imperium in an era <strong>of</strong> failed states. Firstly, he proposes that ownership <strong>of</strong><br />

the “mines and wells” be transferred to an international body, which he<br />

terms the International Resource Fund (perhaps constituted by an<br />

amalgamation <strong>of</strong> the I.M.F. and World Bank). The political form <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country could then be structured around the use <strong>of</strong> the natural resources.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Iraq, he argues:<br />

there is no reason to hold this artificial state together. It is not a<br />

nation. The only conceivable reason to keep it united is its oil<br />

wealth, concentrated in the north, controlled by the Kurds, and in<br />

the South, by the Shia . . . One solution would be to put the<br />

revenue from Iraq’s oil wealth into [an] International Resources<br />

Fund (I.N.R.F.) . . . and for three autonomous self-governing<br />

regions to be created. 67<br />

Lal recognizes that nations whose natural resources have been expropriated<br />

in such a manner may retain a desire to regain their wealth. In<br />

2004, while speaking to a Cato Institute conference in Russia on the role<br />

<strong>of</strong> international organizations, Lal asked: how could “predators” be<br />

prevented from attacking and capturing the “mines and wells” generating<br />

the rents? His answer:<br />

Here the military prowess <strong>of</strong> an Imperial power or a coalition <strong>of</strong><br />

such powers is crucial. Such a power could follow the example <strong>of</strong><br />

China during the inter-war period. Foreign companies could be<br />

leased territory which they could protect with their own police<br />

forces, in return for royalties to the I.N.R.F. But even this privatized<br />

solution would require the imperial power to maintain<br />

“gunboats and Gurkhas” at the ready, in case some local predator<br />

decided to mount a challenge to the private controllers <strong>of</strong> these<br />

mines. 68<br />

In other words, there are some countries in the current world order<br />

whose states lack the requisite disciplinary mechanisms to facilitate<br />

imperial plunder. These so-called “failed states” should have their<br />

functions privatized by international corporations – backed up by the<br />

might <strong>of</strong> the imperial army if necessary.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!