28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eturn to formal empire as the only viable imperialist solution in a world<br />

order <strong>of</strong> limited states and the unlimited reach <strong>of</strong> capital. In chapter 7,<br />

Thom Workman traces the philosophical lineage <strong>of</strong> the neoconservatives<br />

who dominate the Bush administration, many <strong>of</strong> whom studied with the<br />

philosopher Leo Strauss. Strauss’s tendentious interpretation <strong>of</strong> ancient<br />

texts, Workman contends, is key to understanding the justification for<br />

war and empire that informs American foreign policy. Adam Hanieh<br />

examines the influence <strong>of</strong> the neoliberal economist Deepak Lal’s In Praise<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Empire</strong>s. Hanieh demonstrates that Lal’s ideas about empire should be<br />

understood in the context <strong>of</strong> the material and social forces now shaping<br />

global capitalism. In chapter 9, Tanner Mirrlees exposes the new discourse<br />

<strong>of</strong> U.S. “s<strong>of</strong>t power” as a disguise for a renovated, high-tech form<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultural imperialism. In the final chapter, Paul Cammack argues that<br />

over the last five years the U.N.-sponsored Millennium Development<br />

Goals have been transformed into a vehicle for a new imperialist project<br />

involving the export <strong>of</strong> capitalism to the developing world.<br />

As these essays make clear, the rationalizations on <strong>of</strong>fer for the new<br />

imperialism, like the system they seek to defend, are riven by deep<br />

contradictions. That such contradictions should exist is inscribed in the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> ideology. It is the task <strong>of</strong> ideological critique – and therefore <strong>of</strong><br />

this volume – to help lay bare these antinomies and to make visible that<br />

which the apologists for imperialism – the new watchdogs <strong>of</strong> our time –<br />

would prefer to leave in the shadows.<br />

NOTES<br />

MOOERS: Introduction 7<br />

1. Paul Nizan, The Watchdogs: Philosophers and the Established Order,trans.Paul<br />

Fiting<strong>of</strong>f (<strong>New</strong> York: Monthly Review Press, 1972), p. 117.<br />

2. Among this group was the then French interior minister and future socialist president<br />

François Mitterand, whose response to the National Liberation Front’s (F.L.N.) <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

<strong>of</strong> talks was, “the only possible negotiation is war.” The Algerian-born philosopher<br />

and novelist Albert Camus, although troubled by the French use <strong>of</strong> torture, ultimately<br />

supported the war against the Algerian rebels. Ahmed Ben Bella, one <strong>of</strong> the leaders <strong>of</strong><br />

the Algerian liberation struggle, now in his late eighties, is still actively involved in the<br />

Middle Eastern anti-war movement against the U.S. occupation in Iraq.<br />

3. Gillo Pontecervo’s brilliant anti-colonial film The Battle <strong>of</strong> Algiers is required viewing<br />

by American counter-insurgency experts in the U.S. Defense Department. See John<br />

Cherian, “Remembering a Revolution,” Frontline, 21:24 (20 November–3 December,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!