New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WORKMAN: When Might is Right 151<br />
custodians <strong>of</strong> the natural order <strong>of</strong> things, especially the goddess Nemesis.<br />
The tragic personage or nation, in the face <strong>of</strong> this transgression, then<br />
suffers a reversal <strong>of</strong> fortune understood as divine vengeance on overweening<br />
mortals.<br />
In the History the Athenian massacre at Melos is immediately followed<br />
by the account <strong>of</strong> the Sicilian expedition. The Athenian massacre at<br />
Melos had shaken Athens to its core, and any reader <strong>of</strong> the History would<br />
have known that the formidable Athenian forces were routed in Sicily.<br />
Thucydides immediately establishes that when the Athenians launched<br />
the Sicilian expedition they “were for the most part ignorant <strong>of</strong> the size<br />
<strong>of</strong> the island and <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> its inhabitants, both Hellenic and<br />
native, and they did not realize that they were taking on a war <strong>of</strong> almost<br />
the same magnitude as their war against the Peloponnesians.” 37 Despite<br />
Nicias’ warnings about the folly <strong>of</strong> far-flung aggression, the Athenians,<br />
drunk with hybris, pressed on to Sicily. When “this most costly and<br />
finest-looking force <strong>of</strong> Hellenic troops up to that time” was poised to set<br />
sail, Thucydides tells us that crowds gathered on the shore “merely to see<br />
the show and to admire the incredible ambition <strong>of</strong> the thing.” Wine was<br />
poured, prayers were made, and the spectacular armada <strong>of</strong> the “most<br />
far-reaching kind” set sail for disaster. 38 The overweening Athenians<br />
suffered ignominious defeat at Syracuse, and would eventually lose the<br />
Peloponnesian War to Sparta.<br />
Thucydides’ narration continues in the tradition <strong>of</strong> Herodotus’ tragic<br />
Histories. In their circumference the Histories <strong>of</strong> Herodotus present the<br />
rise and fall <strong>of</strong> four successive Persian emperors beginning with Cyrus in<br />
559 and ending with Xerxes’ final defeat at Plataea in the summer <strong>of</strong> 479<br />
at the hands <strong>of</strong> Spartan hoplites. Each king <strong>of</strong> the Achaemenid empire –<br />
Cyrus (559–529 B.C.E.), Cambyses (529–522), Darius (521–486), and his<br />
son Xerxes (486–465) – follows a distinct cycle <strong>of</strong> consolidation, territorial<br />
expansion, and military defeat at the edges <strong>of</strong> their realm. Each<br />
defeat is final and irreversible; each defeat comes on the heels <strong>of</strong> wise<br />
counsel strongly admonishing the emperor in question to reconsider his<br />
expansionist plans; and each emperor appears as a living violation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Delphic maxims “know thyself” and “nothing in excess” as he succumbs<br />
to the belief that he is god-like, and that the expansion <strong>of</strong> his realm has<br />
no natural limits. At the moment <strong>of</strong> their most frivolous annexation their<br />
fortunes are dramatically reversed. Herodotus’ story <strong>of</strong> the Persian<br />
invasions is cast as a story <strong>of</strong> over-reaching emperors who invite godly