28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HANIEH: Praising <strong>Empire</strong> 179<br />

recurring crises <strong>of</strong> the hegemonic centre. 28 The “empire <strong>of</strong> free trade”<br />

advocated by Lal and others, reflects this basic tendency <strong>of</strong> capital to<br />

expand across the globe. In recent decades the most striking expansion at<br />

this level has been the spread <strong>of</strong> capitalist exchange relations into the<br />

former Soviet Union, eastern Europe, and more recently China.<br />

Christian Palloix described this process as the internationalization <strong>of</strong><br />

capital. 29 He stressed that internationalization <strong>of</strong> capital should not be<br />

understood as an increase in the multinational nature <strong>of</strong> a firm’s capital<br />

or even the increasing international movement <strong>of</strong> capital. Rather,<br />

internationalization should be seen in light <strong>of</strong> the circuit <strong>of</strong> capital,<br />

specifically, the increasing spread <strong>of</strong> capitalist social relations. The<br />

reasons behind internationalization are “the need to produce, reproduce,<br />

and constantly expand the basic capitalist relation, the class relation.” 30<br />

Occurring alongside the internationalization <strong>of</strong> capital is the tendency<br />

towards its concentration and centralization. Increasing amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

capital become concentrated in fewer hands, generally located in the<br />

richest countries. This phenomenon was identified in the classical<br />

theories <strong>of</strong> Lenin, Bukharin, and Hilferding as central to the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> imperialism. As capital comes under the control <strong>of</strong> a handful<br />

<strong>of</strong> huge conglomerates it seeks to expand across the globe in search <strong>of</strong><br />

higher pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />

The centralization and concentration <strong>of</strong> capital is clearly shown in the<br />

domination <strong>of</strong> all sectors <strong>of</strong> the world economy by a handful <strong>of</strong> corporations.<br />

Look at the food sector: five companies control 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s grain trade, six companies control nearly 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

pesticide market, three companies control 85 percent <strong>of</strong> the world’s tea<br />

market, two companies control 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the world trade in bananas,<br />

and three companies control almost 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the confectionary<br />

market. Four companies control 75 percent <strong>of</strong> all retail trade in the U.K.<br />

In media and entertainment, nine large conglomerates dominate the<br />

sector, with five companies controlling around 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the music<br />

industry worldwide. 31<br />

Capital becomes centralized and concentrated not just in specific<br />

corporations but also in particular geographic regions. This is the reason<br />

for the uneven spatial development that is germane to modern capitalism<br />

and is reflected within nations and regions as well as between nations. 32<br />

Indeed, it is a striking and undeniable fact that global inequality has<br />

consistently widened over the last 150 years <strong>of</strong> capitalist history. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!