New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HANIEH: Praising <strong>Empire</strong> 179<br />
recurring crises <strong>of</strong> the hegemonic centre. 28 The “empire <strong>of</strong> free trade”<br />
advocated by Lal and others, reflects this basic tendency <strong>of</strong> capital to<br />
expand across the globe. In recent decades the most striking expansion at<br />
this level has been the spread <strong>of</strong> capitalist exchange relations into the<br />
former Soviet Union, eastern Europe, and more recently China.<br />
Christian Palloix described this process as the internationalization <strong>of</strong><br />
capital. 29 He stressed that internationalization <strong>of</strong> capital should not be<br />
understood as an increase in the multinational nature <strong>of</strong> a firm’s capital<br />
or even the increasing international movement <strong>of</strong> capital. Rather,<br />
internationalization should be seen in light <strong>of</strong> the circuit <strong>of</strong> capital,<br />
specifically, the increasing spread <strong>of</strong> capitalist social relations. The<br />
reasons behind internationalization are “the need to produce, reproduce,<br />
and constantly expand the basic capitalist relation, the class relation.” 30<br />
Occurring alongside the internationalization <strong>of</strong> capital is the tendency<br />
towards its concentration and centralization. Increasing amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
capital become concentrated in fewer hands, generally located in the<br />
richest countries. This phenomenon was identified in the classical<br />
theories <strong>of</strong> Lenin, Bukharin, and Hilferding as central to the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> imperialism. As capital comes under the control <strong>of</strong> a handful<br />
<strong>of</strong> huge conglomerates it seeks to expand across the globe in search <strong>of</strong><br />
higher pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />
The centralization and concentration <strong>of</strong> capital is clearly shown in the<br />
domination <strong>of</strong> all sectors <strong>of</strong> the world economy by a handful <strong>of</strong> corporations.<br />
Look at the food sector: five companies control 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world’s grain trade, six companies control nearly 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
pesticide market, three companies control 85 percent <strong>of</strong> the world’s tea<br />
market, two companies control 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the world trade in bananas,<br />
and three companies control almost 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the confectionary<br />
market. Four companies control 75 percent <strong>of</strong> all retail trade in the U.K.<br />
In media and entertainment, nine large conglomerates dominate the<br />
sector, with five companies controlling around 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the music<br />
industry worldwide. 31<br />
Capital becomes centralized and concentrated not just in specific<br />
corporations but also in particular geographic regions. This is the reason<br />
for the uneven spatial development that is germane to modern capitalism<br />
and is reflected within nations and regions as well as between nations. 32<br />
Indeed, it is a striking and undeniable fact that global inequality has<br />
consistently widened over the last 150 years <strong>of</strong> capitalist history. This