New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
216 The <strong>New</strong> <strong>Imperialists</strong><br />
commercial press with a totalitarian propaganda structure has dire implications<br />
for non-American news media as well. Qatar-based Al Jazeera,<br />
perhaps the only broadcasting network in the region that exemplifies the<br />
pluralistic and open ideals <strong>of</strong> the U.S. commercial media, is, in<br />
Armistead’s mind, “a market competitor for U.S. psychological operations<br />
and public affairs broadcasting in the Middle East.” 75 Al Jazeera’s<br />
critical coverage <strong>of</strong> the U.S. occupation <strong>of</strong> Iraq and critical commentary<br />
on U.S. foreign policy is a problem for Armistead. As if to make Al Jazeera<br />
the next target <strong>of</strong> American information operations, Armistead states, “the<br />
United States Government’s response to Al Jazeera thus far has been<br />
rather clumsy. The government has yet to display a coordinated communications<br />
strategy to deal with Al Jazeera and similar Middle Eastern<br />
media outlets. Until this happens, the United States will continue to lose<br />
ground in global media confrontations.” 76<br />
Following Armistead’s recommendations, a C.N.A. on Al Jazeera’s<br />
information database or a well-crafted psychological operations campaign<br />
to indoctrinate its journalists with pro-U.S. values might be an<br />
adequate strategy for dealing with this pesky competitor. Armistead’s<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> Al Jazeera (with its U.S.-style commercialism and purported<br />
commitment to a balanced reportage <strong>of</strong> events) as a threat to U.S.<br />
foreign policy in the Middle East contradicts America’s purported goals:<br />
if the point is to spread liberal capitalist democracy and its associated<br />
institutions, then why must the media that looks most like America’s be<br />
dealt with so sternly? Global media market openness, a diversity <strong>of</strong><br />
perspectives, and objective reporting is allowed to flourish, but only<br />
when openness, diversity, and objective news media respect the worldview<br />
<strong>of</strong> Washington. For unapologetic military strategists like Armistead,<br />
the s<strong>of</strong>t power <strong>of</strong> the U.S. state may encourage freedom <strong>of</strong> the press at<br />
home and abroad, but only when liberated media transmit the cultural<br />
codes <strong>of</strong> imperial America.<br />
MATTHEW FRASER: AMERICAN SOFT POWER AS THE GLOBAL<br />
AMERICAN CULTURAL INDUSTRY<br />
Most empires rule by collaborating with the local elite <strong>of</strong> their subject<br />
territories, which help the empire to foster and manage more effectively<br />
the political, economic, and cultural conditions that are amenable to its<br />
dominance. The local elite aligns itself with the ruling-class interests <strong>of</strong>