28.07.2013 Views

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HANIEH: Praising <strong>Empire</strong> 183<br />

visible property title. Many people living in slums, for example, do not<br />

hold rental contracts or have any pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership for their living<br />

space. This property, therefore, cannot be used as collateral when<br />

applying for loans or to create securities that can then be bought and sold<br />

on secondary markets. 43 Property, formally recognized by title, not only<br />

leverages debt but also provides a link in the owner’s credit history, a<br />

place to collect debts and taxes, and acts as a distribution point for<br />

utilities. 44<br />

Consequently for De Soto, the poor are poor because they lack the<br />

means <strong>of</strong> leveraging their property into capital due to a lack <strong>of</strong> a formal<br />

property system. What distinguishes the affluence <strong>of</strong> the Nile Hilton<br />

Hotel from the poverty found in the rest <strong>of</strong> Cairo is simply the fact that<br />

the world outside the hotel is without “legally enforceable property<br />

rights.” 45 While Haiti might be the poorest country in the western<br />

hemisphere, with a history dominated by a rapacious colonialism and<br />

slavery, the value <strong>of</strong> untitled rural and urban real estate in that country<br />

is $5.2 billion according to De Soto. 46 If the “extra-legal” apartments,<br />

businesses, and other property present throughout the slums <strong>of</strong> Haiti<br />

entered the market in a system that gave property titles to their owners,<br />

then Haiti would presumably require no foreign aid.<br />

Reaffirming the pioneer myth, De Soto praises the determination <strong>of</strong><br />

early North American settlers who marked out their new farmlands by<br />

simply squatting on them. He naturally avoids any mention <strong>of</strong> the devastation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the indigenous population <strong>of</strong> North America and the theft <strong>of</strong><br />

most <strong>of</strong> the continent as the fruits <strong>of</strong> this genocide. Instead he chooses to<br />

marvel at the “superabundance <strong>of</strong> land in British North America [that]<br />

presented the first settlers with opportunities unimaginable in the<br />

Europe they had left.” 47 To De Soto, the secret <strong>of</strong> U.S. global supremacy<br />

lies in a legal system that gradually incorporated, recognized, and integrated<br />

these “extra-legal” property rights, establishing a unified property<br />

system that recognized squatter rights and created “the expanded<br />

markets and capital needed to fuel explosive economic growth.” 48<br />

Plainly speaking, the implication <strong>of</strong> establishing the system <strong>of</strong><br />

property rights advocated by De Soto is to make accessible to global<br />

capital the large swathes <strong>of</strong> Third World property that are currently<br />

“extra-legal” or outside the sphere <strong>of</strong> capitalist property relations. Given<br />

the unequal levels <strong>of</strong> power that exist in the marketplace, the result <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!