New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
New Imperialists : Ideologies of Empire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HANIEH: Praising <strong>Empire</strong> 183<br />
visible property title. Many people living in slums, for example, do not<br />
hold rental contracts or have any pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership for their living<br />
space. This property, therefore, cannot be used as collateral when<br />
applying for loans or to create securities that can then be bought and sold<br />
on secondary markets. 43 Property, formally recognized by title, not only<br />
leverages debt but also provides a link in the owner’s credit history, a<br />
place to collect debts and taxes, and acts as a distribution point for<br />
utilities. 44<br />
Consequently for De Soto, the poor are poor because they lack the<br />
means <strong>of</strong> leveraging their property into capital due to a lack <strong>of</strong> a formal<br />
property system. What distinguishes the affluence <strong>of</strong> the Nile Hilton<br />
Hotel from the poverty found in the rest <strong>of</strong> Cairo is simply the fact that<br />
the world outside the hotel is without “legally enforceable property<br />
rights.” 45 While Haiti might be the poorest country in the western<br />
hemisphere, with a history dominated by a rapacious colonialism and<br />
slavery, the value <strong>of</strong> untitled rural and urban real estate in that country<br />
is $5.2 billion according to De Soto. 46 If the “extra-legal” apartments,<br />
businesses, and other property present throughout the slums <strong>of</strong> Haiti<br />
entered the market in a system that gave property titles to their owners,<br />
then Haiti would presumably require no foreign aid.<br />
Reaffirming the pioneer myth, De Soto praises the determination <strong>of</strong><br />
early North American settlers who marked out their new farmlands by<br />
simply squatting on them. He naturally avoids any mention <strong>of</strong> the devastation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the indigenous population <strong>of</strong> North America and the theft <strong>of</strong><br />
most <strong>of</strong> the continent as the fruits <strong>of</strong> this genocide. Instead he chooses to<br />
marvel at the “superabundance <strong>of</strong> land in British North America [that]<br />
presented the first settlers with opportunities unimaginable in the<br />
Europe they had left.” 47 To De Soto, the secret <strong>of</strong> U.S. global supremacy<br />
lies in a legal system that gradually incorporated, recognized, and integrated<br />
these “extra-legal” property rights, establishing a unified property<br />
system that recognized squatter rights and created “the expanded<br />
markets and capital needed to fuel explosive economic growth.” 48<br />
Plainly speaking, the implication <strong>of</strong> establishing the system <strong>of</strong><br />
property rights advocated by De Soto is to make accessible to global<br />
capital the large swathes <strong>of</strong> Third World property that are currently<br />
“extra-legal” or outside the sphere <strong>of</strong> capitalist property relations. Given<br />
the unequal levels <strong>of</strong> power that exist in the marketplace, the result <strong>of</strong>