CHAPTER XIV. 56 CHAPTER XIV. THE PROTOCOL AND ARTICLE TEN OF THE COVENANT. It is to be remembered that in this portion of the discussion consideration is given only to the relations inter se of the Signatories to the <strong>Protocol</strong>. As among these States the famous Article 10 of the Covenant will have lost all its significance. Article 10 of the Covenant has two distinct aspects. <strong>The</strong> more important of these is the undertaking <strong>by</strong> the Members of the League to "preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence" of other Members. Because of these guarantees Article 10 was objected to in this country and in Canada chiefly for the reason that it might involve the use of armed force <strong>by</strong> the guarantor States. <strong>The</strong> further idea that this use of armed force would necessarily come into play upon a decision of the Council of the League of Nations was largely fallacious and was practically removed <strong>by</strong> the resolution of the Assembly regarding Article 10.[1] <strong>The</strong> other side of these guarantees of Article 10, which has perhaps not always been very well appreciated, is that the obligation of a guarantor State under Article 10 may be very limited indeed and may even be nothing at all, even in the case of a wilful attack. Article 10 goes only to two things, territorial integrity and political independence. If an aggressor State respects these two things it can do otherwise what it chooses, so far as the guarantor States are concerned. For example, under Article 10 alone and taking nothing else into consideration, one State could attack another, destroy every building in the country, blow up every mine, and lay waste every field, and then retire, saying: <strong>The</strong> territorial integrity of the country attacked is now preserved, and its remaining inhabitants retain their full political independence. Under such circumstances, no guarantor State under Article 10 of the Covenant of the League of Nations would be obliged to do anything. {85} Now I say that under the <strong>Protocol</strong> any significance of Article 10, as among the parties to the <strong>Protocol</strong>, has disappeared; clearly this is so. Article 10, so to speak, waited, or at least might wait till the end of the war.[2] If the aggressor State did not in the Treaty of Peace or otherwise annex any territory and left the attacked State independent, Article 10 did nothing at all.[3] But the <strong>Protocol</strong> commences to work even before any war commences and certainly at its commencement; there must be no attack.[4] It is not a question of the final result of the attack; it is merely a question of the existence of the aggression; and it is then that all the other parties to the <strong>Protocol</strong> come to the defence of the attacked State. <strong>The</strong> lesser Article 10 of the Covenant is swallowed up in the greater <strong>Protocol</strong>. <strong>The</strong> other aspect of Article 10 of the Covenant was the undertaking <strong>by</strong> each Member of the League to respect the territorial integrity and political independence of the other Members. This, of course, is an undertaking in regard only to the acts of the State giving it. Such a self-denying clause would be implied in the Covenant if it were not expressed and equally, of course, it is inherent in the <strong>Protocol</strong>. Indeed, in the <strong>Protocol</strong> it was thought necessary to insert a provision regarding the political independence and territorial integrity, not of the attacked State but of the aggressor. All that is left now of Article 10, so far as the signatories to the <strong>Protocol</strong> inter se are concerned, is to be found in the second paragraph of Article 15 of the <strong>Protocol</strong>, which says that the territorial integrity and the political independence of the aggressor State shall not be affected <strong>by</strong> the application of the sanctions of the <strong>Protocol</strong>. A development of the Covenant <strong>by</strong> which Article 10 becomes unimportant, except as a measure of protection for an aggressor, is perhaps the most remarkable and unforeseen of all possible developments.
CHAPTER XIV. 57 [1] September 25, 1923. Technically, the resolution was not adopted, the vote not being unanimous, 29 in favor, one, Persia, opposed, and 22 absent or abstaining. League of Nations Official Journal, October, 1923, Special Supplement No. 11, p. 34. [2] i. e., so far as the Guarantor States are concerned. [3] In the debates of the First Committee of the Fourth Assembly it was asserted that "no forcible invasion" is possible without a violation of Article 10 of the Covenant; but in certain circumstances war is permissible under the Covenant (Article 15, Paragraph 7); and with a permissible war, there could be a permissible invasion. See Oppenheim, 3rd edition, Vol. 1, page 739. [4] i. e., no aggression, in the sense intended <strong>by</strong> the <strong>Protocol</strong>. {86}
- Page 1 and 2:
The Geneva Protocol, by David Hunte
- Page 3 and 4:
The Geneva Protocol, by David Hunte
- Page 5 and 6: CHAPTER I. 5 CHAPTER I. THE PROTOCO
- Page 7 and 8: CHAPTER II. 7 CHAPTER II. POINTS OF
- Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER III. 9 CHAPTER III. THE COM
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER III. 11 Armaments to be dra
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER IV. 13 Russia will certainl
- Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER V. 15 The first point to be
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER VI. 17 CHAPTER VI. INTERNAT
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER VI. 19 (a) The interpretati
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER VI. 21 It should be pointed
- Page 23 and 24: CHAPTER VII. 23 CHAPTER VII. THE ST
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER VII. 25 As a preliminary, l
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER VII. 27 shall not be change
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER VII. 29 Of course some coun
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER VII. 31 And it must not be
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER VIII. 33 CHAPTER VIII. DOME
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER IX. 35 CHAPTER IX. COVENANT
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER IX. 37 [2] Annex C, p. 180;
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER X. 39 The view of the Repor
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER X. 41 Here again, however,
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER X. 43 [8] September 5, 1924
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER XI. 45 "If the question is
- Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER XI. 47 meaning and result.
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER XII. 49 CHAPTER XII. SANCTI
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER XII. 51 Now what Article 11
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER XII. 53 the mutually suppor
- Page 55: CHAPTER XIII. 55 CHAPTER XIII. SEPA
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER XV. 59 However, the questio
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER XV. 61 from treaty and cons
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER XV. 63 unless the United St
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER XVI. 65 We can look back on
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER XVII. 67 CHAPTER XVII. DEMI
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER XVIII. 69 CHAPTER XVIII. SE
- Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER XX. 71 CHAPTER XX. THE "AME
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER XX. 73 the growth and devel
- Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER XX. 75 B. THE PROTOCOL OF G
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER XX. 77 represented at the m
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER XX. 79 diplomacy, they will
- Page 81 and 82: CHAPTER XX. 81 Upon such invitation
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER XX. 83 (f) will endeavour t
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER XX. 85 Covenant of amendmen
- Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER XX. 87 {137} (b) If within
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER XX. 89 l'examen du différe
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER XX. 91 For the purposes of
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER XX. 93 nature, les ouvertur
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER XX. 95 ARTICLE 14. The Coun
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER XX. 97 Council shall draw u
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER XX. 99 INTRODUCTION. After
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER XX. 101 footing. Armaments
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER XX. 103 An agreement has be
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER XX. 105 signatory States wh
- Page 107 and 108:
CHAPTER XX. 107 with the Council or
- Page 109 and 110:
CHAPTER XX. 109 (a) Compulsory arbi
- Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER XX. 111 must comply is that
- Page 113 and 114:
CHAPTER XX. 113 by the Council. In
- Page 115 and 116:
CHAPTER XX. 115 which resorts in an
- Page 117 and 118:
CHAPTER XX. 117 themselves decide w
- Page 119 and 120:
CHAPTER XX. 119 reduction of armame
- Page 121 and 122:
CHAPTER XX. 121 At the time when th
- Page 123 and 124:
CHAPTER XX. 123 (b) The elimination
- Page 125 and 126:
CHAPTER XX. 125 and published by th
- Page 127 and 128:
CHAPTER XX. 127 {209} But this abso
- Page 129 and 130:
CHAPTER XX. 129 Welcomes warmly the
- Page 131 and 132:
CHAPTER XX. 131 RESOLUTION OF THE C
- Page 133 and 134:
CHAPTER XX. 133 2. Certain Governme
- Page 135 and 136:
CHAPTER XX. 135 of armaments may re
- Page 137 and 138:
CHAPTER XX. 137 18. The above brief
- Page 139 and 140:
CHAPTER XX. 139 Justice, had been e
- Page 141 and 142:
CHAPTER XX. 141 {235} 41. Article 5
- Page 143 and 144:
CHAPTER XX. 143 48. Article 1 was d
- Page 145 and 146:
CHAPTER XX. 145 representatives of
- Page 147 and 148:
CHAPTER XX. 147 72. The draft of a
- Page 149 and 150:
CHAPTER XX. 149 the parties makes p
- Page 151 and 152:
CHAPTER XX. 151 financial sanctions
- Page 153 and 154:
CHAPTER XX. 153 reduction of armame
- Page 155 and 156:
CHAPTER XX. 155 After the work of t
- Page 157 and 158:
CHAPTER II. 157 CHAPTER II. ACTS OF
- Page 159 and 160:
CHAPTER IV. 159 CHAPTER IV. DECREES
- Page 161 and 162:
CHAPTER IV. 161 2. The said Commiss
- Page 163 and 164:
CHAPTER IV. 163 by the acceptance o
- Page 165 and 166:
CHAPTER IV. 165 [Sidenote: Numbers
- Page 167 and 168:
CHAPTER IV. 167 If a Member of the
- Page 169 and 170:
CHAPTER IV. 169 effectively in supp
- Page 171 and 172:
CHAPTER IV. 171 Page numbers in thi
- Page 173 and 174:
CHAPTER IV. 173 must, at no additio
- Page 175 and 176:
CHAPTER IV. 175 The Foundation's pr