07.08.2013 Views

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From: Lorna Duggan<br />

Sent: 24 January 2011 06:51<br />

To: LAWCOM Criminal <strong>Law</strong><br />

Subject: <strong>Consultation</strong> on Fitness <strong>to</strong> plead<br />

A well thought out and comprehensive piece of work. My comments are from the<br />

perspective of a 12 years' experience as a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist in<br />

Developmental Disabilities working in the independent sec<strong>to</strong>r in medium and low<br />

security (both adults and children). I have been instructed by both the prosecution<br />

and the defence (once by the trial judge) with the defence raising the issue in approx<br />

>95% of cases. Defence solici<strong>to</strong>rs are generally very accurate in identifying<br />

defendants who are unfit <strong>to</strong> plead.<br />

In many cases the legal professionals appear unsure of the process <strong>to</strong> be followed and<br />

I have advised the court. Clearly, an uncomfortable position. In addition, some<br />

psychiatrists are unsure of the Pritchard criteria and what they mean eg guilty means<br />

you've done it and not guilty means you didn't, rather than a more sophisticated<br />

answer. This becomes apparent when the Judge hears the issue, however, in many<br />

cases the issue may not be raised because of erroneous conclusions of the psychiatrist<br />

instructed by the defence. The seriousness of the consequences are clear.<br />

From my experience of special measures in youth courts a proportion of children are<br />

put through the trial process when they cannot effectively participate and there is a<br />

presumption that this is OK. I am concerned that for a group of defendants whatever<br />

is done the person cannot effectively participate in their trial - the concepts are just<br />

<strong>to</strong>o complicated. As Einstein is quoted as saying "Everything should be made as<br />

simple as possible, but not simpler"<br />

Regarding the proposals<br />

LIST OF PROVISIONAL PROPOSALS AND<br />

QUESTIONS<br />

PROVISIONAL PROPOSALS<br />

9.1 We provisionally propose that:<br />

(1) The current Pritchard test should be replaced and there should be a new<br />

legal test which assesses whether the accused has decision-making<br />

capacity for trial. This test should take in<strong>to</strong> account all the requirements

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!