07.08.2013 Views

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the incidence of mental disorder issues amongst defendants. Further they<br />

are involved in devising effective procedures <strong>to</strong> identify those accused of<br />

a criminal offence who are or maybe suffering from mental disorders or<br />

learning disabilities or difficulties and, where appropriate divert them<br />

either from the criminal justice system or <strong>to</strong> appropriate agencies who can<br />

assist. This aspect may be of significance when considering the position<br />

in relation <strong>to</strong> cases being heard in the Magistrates’ Courts.<br />

Consideration of the issues raised in the <strong>Consultation</strong> Paper.<br />

Provisional Proposal 1: The current Pritchard test should be replaced and<br />

there should be a new legal test which assesses whether the accused has<br />

decision-making capacity for trial. This test should take in<strong>to</strong> account all<br />

requirements for meaningful participation in the criminal proceedings.<br />

Reply<br />

15. The first issue is whether the present test permits sufficiently of the active<br />

participation of an accused who is suffering from a disability.<br />

16. We agree that the present Pritchard test does not and should be replaced<br />

by a decision-making capacity test. We accept that the current test as set<br />

out and developed from R v Pritchard is based upon cognitive ability. As<br />

such, it is insufficient <strong>to</strong> accord with the approaches of the medical<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!