07.08.2013 Views

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

witnesses who are commissioned <strong>to</strong> undertake this work needs <strong>to</strong> be more<br />

rigorously assessed. The simple answer might be that if more care is taken in<br />

the choice of expert, then better assessments of Fitness <strong>to</strong> <strong>Plead</strong> might be the<br />

result. At the present time Defence and Prosecution Counsel are able <strong>to</strong><br />

commission any psychiatrist <strong>to</strong> give an opinion on Fitness <strong>to</strong> <strong>Plead</strong>, even if<br />

they do not have the specialist knowledge and background of forensic<br />

psychiatrists. Perhaps the safest view on this matter is that if a test is<br />

developed then Assessors should be free <strong>to</strong> use the test if they want <strong>to</strong> but<br />

that there should be no expectation that they will have <strong>to</strong> use it. As the <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> states in Paragraph 5.6, Capacity is, in effect, a Clinical decision”.<br />

Provisional Proposal – 13: In the event of a referral back <strong>to</strong> court by<br />

the Secretary of State and where the accused is found <strong>to</strong> be unfit <strong>to</strong><br />

plead,27 there should not be any need <strong>to</strong> have a further hearing on<br />

the issue of whether the accused did the act. This is subject <strong>to</strong> the<br />

proviso that the court considers it <strong>to</strong> be in the interests of justice.28<br />

The College would support this Proposal but add that it might be worth<br />

considering whether the court should make a decision at the time of the<br />

unfitness finding about whether there should be a trial, should fitness be<br />

regained. This is based on the fact the defining of <strong>Unfitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Plead</strong> is meant<br />

<strong>to</strong> postpone a trial not replace it.<br />

Provisional Proposal – 14: In circumstances where a finding under<br />

section 4A is quashed and there has been no challenge <strong>to</strong> a finding in<br />

relation <strong>to</strong> section 4 (that the accused is under a disability) there<br />

should be a power for the Court of Appeal in appropriate<br />

circumstances <strong>to</strong> order a re-hearing under section<br />

Finally, whilst it maybe said that it is not part of the remit of the consultation<br />

paper, the College feels that it is worth stating that a trial of a fit defendant is<br />

preferable <strong>to</strong> a Part 4A hearing of an unfit one. Finding someone unfit<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!