07.08.2013 Views

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 1 : KC RESPONSE TO PROVISIONAL PROPOSALS AND QUESTIONS<br />

Provisional Proposal 1: The current Pritchard test should be replaced and<br />

there should be a new legal test which assesses whether the accused has<br />

decision-making capacity for trial. This test should take in<strong>to</strong> account all the<br />

requirements for meaningful participation in the criminal proceedings.<br />

(Paragraph 3.41)<br />

We agree with this proposal.<br />

In summary we agree with the legal premise and analysis of psychiatric thought behind<br />

the replacement of the Pritchard test with a new decision-making capacity test. The<br />

removal of archaic provisions such as the ability <strong>to</strong> challenge a juror are welcomed.<br />

However essentially it should be noted that the decision - making capacity test by virtue<br />

of the breadth of area it covers, incorporates the Pritchard criteria in <strong>to</strong> its<br />

considerations. KC appreciates that proposed decision - making capacity based test<br />

ensures for fairer treatment of the accused, the proposed test looks in<strong>to</strong> the wide range<br />

of decisions that are required throughout a criminal trial and enables dissemination of<br />

whether the individual accused with his or her particular mental disorder or disability<br />

would be able <strong>to</strong> meaningfully and effectively participate at trial. The concept of effective<br />

participation was not addressed within the criteria of the Pritchard test as it was not a<br />

necessary consideration at the time <strong>to</strong> ask, whether the accused would be able <strong>to</strong> make<br />

effective decisions <strong>to</strong> participate. This is the result of Pritchard test’s emphasis on<br />

cognitive ability rather than decision – making capacity. The reason why KC believes<br />

that the test needs <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account all the requirements of criminal proceedings is <strong>to</strong><br />

ensure fair treatment of the most vulnerable, due process and prevent miscarriages of<br />

justices that were prevalent under the Pritchard test.<br />

From clients case studies at Appendix I – IV it is apparent that the current test does not<br />

adequately deal with unfitness <strong>to</strong> plead in an just and fair manner.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!