07.08.2013 Views

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESPONSE TO THE LAW COMMISSION’S<br />

CONSULTATION PAPER 197: UNFITNESS TO PLEAD<br />

On behalf of the National Steering Group with Responsibility for<br />

Health Policy on Offenders with Learning Disability<br />

I am responding on behalf of the National Steering Group with responsibility for<br />

health policy on Offenders with Learning Disability. The Group is chaired by the<br />

Department of Health but draws its membership from other Government<br />

Departments and the Third Sec<strong>to</strong>r. We have considered the various references <strong>to</strong><br />

Learning Disability in the text of the <strong>Consultation</strong> Paper.<br />

Re 1.34 Provisional Proposal 1<br />

We agree with the need <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account all the requirements for meaningful<br />

participation in criminal proceedings, in accordance with the European Convention of<br />

Human Rights, and the case law that supports it. In assessing capacity where there<br />

is a learning disability, it is essential that the communication skills of the accused,<br />

and their ability <strong>to</strong> communicate effectively, are also taken in<strong>to</strong> consideration.<br />

Re 1.34 Provisional Proposal 2<br />

It is important that the accused fully understands information given, and this is in<br />

some way checked where a learning disability may be present. Support should be<br />

provided by appropriately qualified practitioners. They should have strong<br />

communication skills aimed at people with a learning disability. The use of<br />

intermediaries as for vulnerable witnesses appears <strong>to</strong> be a minimum requirement.<br />

Re 1.34 Provisional Proposals 3 & 4<br />

We agree that there should be a revised single test <strong>to</strong> assess the decision-making<br />

capacity of the accused relevant <strong>to</strong> all the trial decisions that they may be expected<br />

<strong>to</strong> take. If the accused does not have the capacity <strong>to</strong> participate fully and effectively<br />

in all aspects of the trial (supported as required by special measures and reasonable<br />

adjustments), then a ‘fair’ trial does not appear <strong>to</strong> be feasible.<br />

G:\Criminal\Fitness <strong>to</strong> <strong>Plead</strong> and insanity\FTP\<strong>Consultation</strong> responses\NGOs\National Steering Group for Offenders<br />

with LDs\T; National Steering Group with Responsibility for Health Policy on Offenders with Learning Disability.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!